HAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 16.91%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $31.45, signalling upside risk potential of 51.94%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.30 which suggests that it could grow by 17.48%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.499%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Halliburton's net income of $615M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.31x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 22.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.80x versus 3.69x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Liberty Energy has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 2.06%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity of 13.05%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $31.45, signalling upside risk potential of 51.94%. On the other hand Liberty Energy has an analysts' consensus of $16.61 which suggests that it could grow by 43.91%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Liberty Energy, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Liberty Energy.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Energy has a beta of 1.181, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.105%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Liberty Energy offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 15.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Liberty Energy quarterly revenues of $977.5M. Halliburton's net income of $615M is higher than Liberty Energy's net income of $20.1M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.31x while Liberty Energy's PE ratio is 7.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.80x versus 0.46x for Liberty Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 11.8%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $31.45, signalling upside risk potential of 51.94%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $49.84 which suggests that it could grow by 43.96%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Schlumberger.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.846%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Halliburton's net income of $615M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.31x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 11.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.80x versus 1.37x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Targa Resources has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 7.97%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat Targa Resources's return on equity of 29.27%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $31.45, signalling upside risk potential of 51.94%. On the other hand Targa Resources has an analysts' consensus of $215.03 which suggests that it could grow by 30.69%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Targa Resources, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Targa Resources.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Targa Resources has a beta of 1.751, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.072%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.29%. Targa Resources offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources pays out 46.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Targa Resources quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Halliburton's net income of $615M is higher than Targa Resources's net income of $351M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.31x while Targa Resources's PE ratio is 28.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.80x versus 2.22x for Targa Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.