BKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton has a net margin of 16.01% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 10.96%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 18.58% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $49.12, signalling upside risk potential of 29.96%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $31.79 which suggests that it could grow by 45.01%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.349%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Baker Hughes's net income of $1.2B is higher than Halliburton's net income of $615M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.68x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 7.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.36x versus 0.84x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 16.01% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 16.91%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 18.58% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $49.12, signalling upside risk potential of 29.96%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.30 which suggests that it could grow by 17.48%. Given that Baker Hughes has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Baker Hughes is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.499%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Baker Hughes's net income of $1.2B is higher than Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.68x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 22.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.36x versus 3.69x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of 16.01% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of --. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 18.58% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $49.12, signalling upside risk potential of 29.96%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $11.33 which suggests that it could grow by 55.04%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.047%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. Baker Hughes's net income of $1.2B is higher than NextDecade's net income of $65.7M. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.68x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.36x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 16.01% compared to Baker Hughes's net margin of 11.8%. Baker Hughes's return on equity of 18.58% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16%.

Baker Hughes has a consensus price target of $49.12, signalling upside risk potential of 29.96%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $49.84 which suggests that it could grow by 43.96%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.083, which suggesting that the stock is 8.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.846%.

Baker Hughes has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Baker Hughes pays 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Baker Hughes quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Baker Hughes's net income of $1.2B is higher than Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Baker Hughes's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.68x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 11.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baker Hughes is 1.36x versus 1.37x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.