SLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chevron has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 6.7%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Chevron's return on equity of 11.12%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $49.84, signalling upside risk potential of 41.95%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $170.72 which suggests that it could grow by 23.82%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Chevron.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.846% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.932, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.764%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $48.3B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while Chevron's PE ratio is 14.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.39x versus 1.30x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 10.96%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $49.84, signalling upside risk potential of 41.95%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $31.79 which suggests that it could grow by 41.08%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Halliburton.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.846% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.349%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is higher than Halliburton's net income of $615M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 7.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.39x versus 0.87x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 16.91%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $49.84, signalling upside risk potential of 41.95%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.30 which suggests that it could grow by 11.8%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.846% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.499%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is higher than Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 23.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.39x versus 3.88x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 9.39%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $49.84, signalling upside risk potential of 41.95%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $125.06 which suggests that it could grow by 16.75%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.846% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.482%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.29x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.39x versus 1.35x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.