LBRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 10.02%. Liberty Energy's return on equity of 18.92% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 26.15%.

Liberty Energy has a consensus price target of $21.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.56%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $37.06 which suggests that it could grow by 33.98%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Liberty Energy, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Liberty Energy.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.912, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.19%.

Liberty Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Liberty Energy pays 6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 21.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Liberty Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.7B. Liberty Energy's net income of $73.8M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $571M. Notably, Liberty Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 9.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liberty Energy is 0.81x versus 1.07x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of -4.34%. Liberty Energy's return on equity of 18.92% beat KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -205.53%.

Liberty Energy has a consensus price target of $21.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.56%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 102.84%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than Liberty Energy, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than Liberty Energy.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 2.140, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.988%.

Liberty Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. KLX Energy Services Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liberty Energy pays 6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Liberty Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.9M. Liberty Energy's net income of $73.8M is higher than KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Liberty Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while KLX Energy Services Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liberty Energy is 0.81x versus 0.11x for KLX Energy Services Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 16.9%. Liberty Energy's return on equity of 18.92% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.01%.

Liberty Energy has a consensus price target of $21.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.56%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $26.53 which suggests that it could fall by -4.69%. Given that Kinder Morgan has more downside risk than Liberty Energy, analysts believe Liberty Energy is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.748%.

Liberty Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Liberty Energy pays 6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 105.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kinder Morgan's is not.

Liberty Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Liberty Energy's net income of $73.8M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $625M. Notably, Liberty Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 24.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liberty Energy is 0.81x versus 4.08x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Liberty Energy's net margin of 12.95%. Liberty Energy's return on equity of 18.92% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.73%.

Liberty Energy has a consensus price target of $21.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.56%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $55.51 which suggests that it could grow by 43.22%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Liberty Energy, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Liberty Energy.

Liberty Energy has a beta of 1.666, which suggesting that the stock is 66.611% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.524, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.415%.

Liberty Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Liberty Energy pays 6.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Liberty Energy quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Liberty Energy's net income of $73.8M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Liberty Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.09x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 12.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liberty Energy is 0.81x versus 1.55x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.