SYY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Sysco's net margin of -0.26%. Sysco's return on equity of 90.07% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 1.34%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $82.49, signalling upside risk potential of 12.55%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sysco has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Sysco is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Sysco has a beta of 0.916, which suggesting that the stock is 8.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.536, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.361%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $619.5M. Sysco's net income of $406M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.84x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 46.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.45x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Performance Food Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Sysco's net margin of 0.27%. Sysco's return on equity of 90.07% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity of 9.49%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $82.49, signalling upside risk potential of 12.55%. On the other hand Performance Food Group has an analysts' consensus of $99.26 which suggests that it could grow by 27.48%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than Sysco.

Sysco has a beta of 0.916, which suggesting that the stock is 8.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.285%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Performance Food Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Performance Food Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than Performance Food Group quarterly revenues of $15.6B. Sysco's net income of $406M is higher than Performance Food Group's net income of $42.4M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.84x while Performance Food Group's PE ratio is 31.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.45x versus 0.20x for Performance Food Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Sysco's net margin of -0.04%. Sysco's return on equity of 90.07% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $82.49, signalling upside risk potential of 12.55%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.41%. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than Sysco.

Sysco has a beta of 0.916, which suggesting that the stock is 8.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.767%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Sysco's net income of $406M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.84x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.45x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Sysco's net margin of 0.7%. Sysco's return on equity of 90.07% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 10.41%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $82.49, signalling upside risk potential of 12.55%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $79.48 which suggests that it could grow by 25.61%. Given that US Foods Holding has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe US Foods Holding is more attractive than Sysco.

Sysco has a beta of 0.916, which suggesting that the stock is 8.424% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.383, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.293%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Sysco's net income of $406M is higher than US Foods Holding's net income of $66M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.84x while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 31.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.45x versus 0.41x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.