UNFI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of -0.04% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 2.32%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 11.64%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.92%. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $69.25 which suggests that it could grow by 30.02%. Given that The Chefs' Warehouse has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe The Chefs' Warehouse is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 1.078, which suggesting that the stock is 7.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.894, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.418%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $1B. United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M is lower than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $23.9M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 40.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.62x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of -0.04% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 0.05%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 3.29%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.92%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 1.078, which suggesting that the stock is 7.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.536, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.361%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $711.3M. United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M is lower than Amcon Distributing's net income of $348.4K. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 20.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco has a net margin of -0.04% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 2.02%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96% beat Sysco's return on equity of 90.07%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.92%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $83.18 which suggests that it could grow by 18.1%. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than Sysco.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 1.078, which suggesting that the stock is 7.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.424%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $20.2B. United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M is lower than Sysco's net income of $406M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sysco's PE ratio is 18.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.43x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of -0.04% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 0.7%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 10.41%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.92%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $79.54 which suggests that it could grow by 26.92%. Given that US Foods Holding has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe US Foods Holding is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 1.078, which suggesting that the stock is 7.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.383, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.293%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are smaller than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.5B. United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M is lower than US Foods Holding's net income of $66M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 31.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.40x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.