PFGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Calavo Growers has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 2.86%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 8.98% beat Calavo Growers's return on equity of 4.71%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $99.49, signalling upside risk potential of 12.94%. On the other hand Calavo Growers has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.11%. Given that Calavo Growers has higher upside potential than Performance Food Group, analysts believe Calavo Growers is more attractive than Performance Food Group.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.026% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.416, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.406%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Calavo Growers offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calavo Growers pays out -829.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.3B, which are larger than Calavo Growers quarterly revenues of $154.4M. Performance Food Group's net income of $58.3M is higher than Calavo Growers's net income of $4.4M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.70x while Calavo Growers's PE ratio is 49.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.22x versus 0.70x for Calavo Growers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of -0.26%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 8.98% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 1.34%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $99.49, signalling upside risk potential of 12.94%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.026% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.189%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.3B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $619.5M. Performance Food Group's net income of $58.3M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.70x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 44.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.22x versus 0.02x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 2.05%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 8.98% beat Sysco's return on equity of 93.26%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $99.49, signalling upside risk potential of 12.94%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $79.68 which suggests that it could grow by 9.99%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than Sysco.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.026% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 0.805, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.533%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.3B, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $19.6B. Performance Food Group's net income of $58.3M is lower than Sysco's net income of $401M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.70x while Sysco's PE ratio is 18.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.22x versus 0.44x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of 0.38% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 1.23%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 8.98% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 11.17%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $99.49, signalling upside risk potential of 12.94%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $80.91 which suggests that it could grow by 5.59%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than US Foods Holding.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.130, which suggesting that the stock is 13.026% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.354, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.373%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.3B, which are larger than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Performance Food Group's net income of $58.3M is lower than US Foods Holding's net income of $115M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.70x while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 35.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.22x versus 0.48x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.