GD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 7.97% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 18.82%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 24.49%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $321.05, signalling upside risk potential of 20.74%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $210.71 which suggests that it could grow by 22.87%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.637%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. General Dynamics pays 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.8B. General Dynamics's net income of $930M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.25x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 30.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.59x versus 2.47x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 7.97% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 7.56%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 6.4%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $321.05, signalling upside risk potential of 20.74%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $277.35 which suggests that it could grow by 30.02%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.236%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. General Dynamics pays 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 70.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are larger than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.3B. General Dynamics's net income of $930M is higher than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $400M. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.25x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 33.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.59x versus 1.92x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 7.97% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 9.49%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $321.05, signalling upside risk potential of 20.74%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $595.55 which suggests that it could grow by 22.01%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.55%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. General Dynamics pays 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $17.1B. General Dynamics's net income of $930M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.25x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.59x versus 1.65x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 7.97% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 7.33%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.41%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $321.05, signalling upside risk potential of 20.74%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $135.51 which suggests that it could grow by 15.99%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than RTX.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.595, which suggesting that the stock is 40.532% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.125%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. RTX offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. General Dynamics pays 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but RTX's is not.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $11.7B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.1B. General Dynamics's net income of $930M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.25x while RTX's PE ratio is 33.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.59x versus 1.98x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.