LHX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 8.2% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 8.61%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $256.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $286.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.63%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than General Dynamics.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.488% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.074%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $13.3B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.21x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.99x versus 1.62x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a net margin of 8.2% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 4.1%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $256.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries has an analysts' consensus of $213.09 which suggests that it could fall by -1.23%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.488% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.338, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.211%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Huntington Ingalls Industries offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays out 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues of $3B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M is higher than Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.21x while Huntington Ingalls Industries's PE ratio is 15.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.99x versus 0.74x for Huntington Ingalls Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 8.2% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 2.83%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $256.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $520.53 which suggests that it could grow by 9.61%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.488% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.059%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18.6B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.21x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 21.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.99x versus 1.60x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 8.2% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 6.85%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $256.40, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $140.38 which suggests that it could grow by 9.45%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than RTX.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.715, which suggesting that the stock is 28.488% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.573%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. RTX offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.21x while RTX's PE ratio is 36.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.99x versus 2.13x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.