RTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 6.85% compared to RTX's net margin of 8.61%. RTX's return on equity of 7.72% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.04%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $288.64 which suggests that it could grow by 15.45%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than General Dynamics.

RTX has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.074%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $21.6B, which are larger than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $13.3B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is higher than General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 18.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 1.95x versus 1.46x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 6.85% compared to RTX's net margin of 17.57%. RTX's return on equity of 7.72% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 27.96%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.04%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $227.46 which suggests that it could grow by 36.36%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.7%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $21.6B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $10.8B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 27.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 1.95x versus 3.99x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 6.85% compared to RTX's net margin of 8.2%. RTX's return on equity of 7.72% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.04%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $257.13 which suggests that it could grow by 27.25%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.488%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $21.6B, which are larger than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.5B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is higher than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 25.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 1.95x versus 1.81x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 6.85% compared to RTX's net margin of 2.83%. RTX's return on equity of 7.72% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 22.04%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $523.76 which suggests that it could grow by 21.2%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

RTX has a beta of 0.604, which suggesting that the stock is 39.573% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.059%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $21.6B, which are larger than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18.6B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is higher than Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 19.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 1.95x versus 1.46x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.