KWGHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of -- compared to Kingswood Holding's net margin of 99.99%. Kingswood Holding's return on equity of -23.74% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72%.

Kingswood Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.80 which suggests that it could grow by 4.55%. Given that Gladstone Investment has higher upside potential than Kingswood Holding, analysts believe Gladstone Investment is more attractive than Kingswood Holding.

Kingswood Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.762%.

Kingswood Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Kingswood Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kingswood Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Kingswood Holding's net income of -- is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Kingswood Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 6.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingswood Holding is 0.90x versus 7.23x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Kingswood Holding's net margin of 17.2%. Kingswood Holding's return on equity of -23.74% beat Janus Henderson Group PLC's return on equity of 8.32%.

Kingswood Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Janus Henderson Group PLC has an analysts' consensus of $45.69 which suggests that it could grow by 21.65%. Given that Janus Henderson Group PLC has higher upside potential than Kingswood Holding, analysts believe Janus Henderson Group PLC is more attractive than Kingswood Holding.

Kingswood Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Janus Henderson Group PLC has a beta of 1.499, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.898%.

Kingswood Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Janus Henderson Group PLC offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Kingswood Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Janus Henderson Group PLC pays out 61.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Janus Henderson Group PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kingswood Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Janus Henderson Group PLC quarterly revenues of $708.3M. Kingswood Holding's net income of -- is lower than Janus Henderson Group PLC's net income of $121.8M. Notably, Kingswood Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Janus Henderson Group PLC's PE ratio is 14.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingswood Holding is 0.90x versus 2.37x for Janus Henderson Group PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of -- compared to Kingswood Holding's net margin of 90.38%. Kingswood Holding's return on equity of -23.74% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

Kingswood Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.47 which suggests that it could grow by 11.64%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Kingswood Holding, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Kingswood Holding.

Kingswood Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.391%.

Kingswood Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Kingswood Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingswood Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Kingswood Holding's net income of -- is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Kingswood Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingswood Holding is 0.90x versus 9.16x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of -- compared to Kingswood Holding's net margin of -121.48%. Kingswood Holding's return on equity of -23.74% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66%.

Kingswood Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $15.92 which suggests that it could grow by 1.03%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than Kingswood Holding, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Kingswood Holding.

Kingswood Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.562%.

Kingswood Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 13.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Kingswood Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kingswood Holding quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Kingswood Holding's net income of -- is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Kingswood Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 23.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingswood Holding is 0.90x versus 26.27x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.