JHG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ares Capital has a net margin of 17.2% compared to Janus Henderson Group PLC's net margin of 90.84%. Janus Henderson Group PLC's return on equity of 8.32% beat Ares Capital's return on equity of 12.36%.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a consensus price target of $45.69, signalling upside risk potential of 21.65%. On the other hand Ares Capital has an analysts' consensus of $23.35 which suggests that it could grow by 9.76%. Given that Janus Henderson Group PLC has higher upside potential than Ares Capital, analysts believe Janus Henderson Group PLC is more attractive than Ares Capital.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a beta of 1.499, which suggesting that the stock is 49.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ares Capital has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.213%.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Ares Capital offers a yield of 9.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Janus Henderson Group PLC pays 61.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Ares Capital pays out 74.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Janus Henderson Group PLC quarterly revenues are $708.3M, which are larger than Ares Capital quarterly revenues of $393M. Janus Henderson Group PLC's net income of $121.8M is lower than Ares Capital's net income of $357M. Notably, Janus Henderson Group PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.67x while Ares Capital's PE ratio is 8.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Group PLC is 2.37x versus 7.77x for Ares Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cohen & has a net margin of 17.2% compared to Janus Henderson Group PLC's net margin of -10.53%. Janus Henderson Group PLC's return on equity of 8.32% beat Cohen &'s return on equity of -0.13%.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a consensus price target of $45.69, signalling upside risk potential of 21.65%. On the other hand Cohen & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Janus Henderson Group PLC has higher upside potential than Cohen &, analysts believe Janus Henderson Group PLC is more attractive than Cohen &.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a beta of 1.499, which suggesting that the stock is 49.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.942%.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Cohen & offers a yield of 12.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Janus Henderson Group PLC pays 61.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Janus Henderson Group PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Janus Henderson Group PLC quarterly revenues are $708.3M, which are larger than Cohen & quarterly revenues of $18.5M. Janus Henderson Group PLC's net income of $121.8M is higher than Cohen &'s net income of -$2M. Notably, Janus Henderson Group PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.67x while Cohen &'s PE ratio is 2.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Group PLC is 2.37x versus 0.57x for Cohen &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kingswood Holding has a net margin of 17.2% compared to Janus Henderson Group PLC's net margin of --. Janus Henderson Group PLC's return on equity of 8.32% beat Kingswood Holding's return on equity of -23.74%.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a consensus price target of $45.69, signalling upside risk potential of 21.65%. On the other hand Kingswood Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Janus Henderson Group PLC has higher upside potential than Kingswood Holding, analysts believe Janus Henderson Group PLC is more attractive than Kingswood Holding.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a beta of 1.499, which suggesting that the stock is 49.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingswood Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Kingswood Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Janus Henderson Group PLC pays 61.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingswood Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Janus Henderson Group PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Janus Henderson Group PLC quarterly revenues are $708.3M, which are larger than Kingswood Holding quarterly revenues of --. Janus Henderson Group PLC's net income of $121.8M is higher than Kingswood Holding's net income of --. Notably, Janus Henderson Group PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.67x while Kingswood Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Group PLC is 2.37x versus 0.90x for Kingswood Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victory Capital Holdings has a net margin of 17.2% compared to Janus Henderson Group PLC's net margin of 33.11%. Janus Henderson Group PLC's return on equity of 8.32% beat Victory Capital Holdings's return on equity of 26.03%.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a consensus price target of $45.69, signalling upside risk potential of 21.65%. On the other hand Victory Capital Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $73.33 which suggests that it could grow by 26.5%. Given that Victory Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than Janus Henderson Group PLC, analysts believe Victory Capital Holdings is more attractive than Janus Henderson Group PLC.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a beta of 1.499, which suggesting that the stock is 49.898% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victory Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.437%.

Janus Henderson Group PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Victory Capital Holdings offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Janus Henderson Group PLC pays 61.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Victory Capital Holdings pays out 35.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Janus Henderson Group PLC quarterly revenues are $708.3M, which are larger than Victory Capital Holdings quarterly revenues of $232.4M. Janus Henderson Group PLC's net income of $121.8M is higher than Victory Capital Holdings's net income of $76.9M. Notably, Janus Henderson Group PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.67x while Victory Capital Holdings's PE ratio is 13.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus Henderson Group PLC is 2.37x versus 4.28x for Victory Capital Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.