COHN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Capital Southwest has a net margin of -10.53% compared to Cohen &'s net margin of 61.13%. Cohen &'s return on equity of -0.13% beat Capital Southwest's return on equity of 8.57%.

Cohen & has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capital Southwest has an analysts' consensus of $23.42 which suggests that it could grow by 14.17%. Given that Capital Southwest has higher upside potential than Cohen &, analysts believe Capital Southwest is more attractive than Cohen &.

Cohen & has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.417%.

Cohen & has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.63%. Capital Southwest offers a yield of 12.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. Cohen & pays -1451.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Southwest pays out 123.43% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cohen & quarterly revenues are $18.5M, which are smaller than Capital Southwest quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Cohen &'s net income of -$2M is lower than Capital Southwest's net income of $16.3M. Notably, Cohen &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while Capital Southwest's PE ratio is 14.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & is 0.61x versus 9.99x for Capital Southwest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Great Elm Group has a net margin of -10.53% compared to Cohen &'s net margin of 33.53%. Cohen &'s return on equity of -0.13% beat Great Elm Group's return on equity of 0%.

Cohen & has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Great Elm Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cohen & has higher upside potential than Great Elm Group, analysts believe Cohen & is more attractive than Great Elm Group.

Cohen & has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Great Elm Group has a beta of 0.809, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.081%.

Cohen & has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.63%. Great Elm Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cohen & pays -1451.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Great Elm Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cohen & quarterly revenues are $18.5M, which are larger than Great Elm Group quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Cohen &'s net income of -$2M is lower than Great Elm Group's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Cohen &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while Great Elm Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & is 0.61x versus 3.24x for Great Elm Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PhenixFIN has a net margin of -10.53% compared to Cohen &'s net margin of 54.65%. Cohen &'s return on equity of -0.13% beat PhenixFIN's return on equity of 10.58%.

Cohen & has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PhenixFIN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -29.65%. Given that PhenixFIN has higher upside potential than Cohen &, analysts believe PhenixFIN is more attractive than Cohen &.

Cohen & has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PhenixFIN has a beta of 0.368, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.187%.

Cohen & has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.63%. PhenixFIN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.43 per share. Cohen & pays -1451.94% of its earnings as a dividend. PhenixFIN pays out 14.21% of its earnings as a dividend. PhenixFIN's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cohen & quarterly revenues are $18.5M, which are larger than PhenixFIN quarterly revenues of $4.5M. Cohen &'s net income of -$2M is lower than PhenixFIN's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Cohen &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while PhenixFIN's PE ratio is 6.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & is 0.61x versus 3.87x for PhenixFIN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rand Capital has a net margin of -10.53% compared to Cohen &'s net margin of 96.31%. Cohen &'s return on equity of -0.13% beat Rand Capital's return on equity of 19.93%.

Cohen & has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rand Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cohen & has higher upside potential than Rand Capital, analysts believe Cohen & is more attractive than Rand Capital.

Cohen & has a beta of 1.340, which suggesting that the stock is 34.004% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rand Capital has a beta of 0.317, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.348%.

Cohen & has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.63%. Rand Capital offers a yield of 8.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Cohen & pays -1451.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Rand Capital pays out 52.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Rand Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cohen & quarterly revenues are $18.5M, which are larger than Rand Capital quarterly revenues of $2.7M. Cohen &'s net income of -$2M is lower than Rand Capital's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Cohen &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 2.11x while Rand Capital's PE ratio is 3.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cohen & is 0.61x versus 3.42x for Rand Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.