VCTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ares Capital has a net margin of 36.34% compared to Victory Capital Holdings's net margin of 91.2%. Victory Capital Holdings's return on equity of 24.27% beat Ares Capital's return on equity of 13.37%.

Victory Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand Ares Capital has an analysts' consensus of $22.64 which suggests that it could grow by 1.95%. Given that Victory Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than Ares Capital, analysts believe Victory Capital Holdings is more attractive than Ares Capital.

Victory Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ares Capital has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.942%.

Victory Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Ares Capital offers a yield of 8.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Victory Capital Holdings pays 40.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Ares Capital pays out 67.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Victory Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $225.6M, which are smaller than Ares Capital quarterly revenues of $432M. Victory Capital Holdings's net income of $82M is lower than Ares Capital's net income of $394M. Notably, Victory Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.37x while Ares Capital's PE ratio is 8.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Capital Holdings is 5.03x versus 7.70x for Ares Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cohen & has a net margin of 36.34% compared to Victory Capital Holdings's net margin of 6.78%. Victory Capital Holdings's return on equity of 24.27% beat Cohen &'s return on equity of 6.72%.

Victory Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand Cohen & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Victory Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than Cohen &, analysts believe Victory Capital Holdings is more attractive than Cohen &.

Victory Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohen & has a beta of 1.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.101%.

Victory Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Cohen & offers a yield of 9.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Victory Capital Holdings pays 40.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Cohen & pays out -34.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Victory Capital Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Victory Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $225.6M, which are larger than Cohen & quarterly revenues of $31.7M. Victory Capital Holdings's net income of $82M is higher than Cohen &'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Victory Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.37x while Cohen &'s PE ratio is 2.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Capital Holdings is 5.03x versus 0.50x for Cohen &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 36.34% compared to Victory Capital Holdings's net margin of 82.11%. Victory Capital Holdings's return on equity of 24.27% beat Capital Southwest's return on equity of 9.95%.

Victory Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand Capital Southwest has an analysts' consensus of $25.17 which suggests that it could grow by 13.62%. Given that Capital Southwest has higher upside potential than Victory Capital Holdings, analysts believe Capital Southwest is more attractive than Victory Capital Holdings.

Victory Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Southwest has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.109%.

Victory Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. Capital Southwest offers a yield of 11.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Victory Capital Holdings pays 40.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Southwest pays out 123.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Victory Capital Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Capital Southwest's is not.

Victory Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $225.6M, which are larger than Capital Southwest quarterly revenues of $27.6M. Victory Capital Holdings's net income of $82M is higher than Capital Southwest's net income of $22.7M. Notably, Victory Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.37x while Capital Southwest's PE ratio is 13.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Capital Holdings is 5.03x versus 9.57x for Capital Southwest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 36.34% compared to Victory Capital Holdings's net margin of 28.82%. Victory Capital Holdings's return on equity of 24.27% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65%.

Victory Capital Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.87%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $83.80 which suggests that it could grow by 1.07%. Given that Victory Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe Victory Capital Holdings is more attractive than SEI Investments.

Victory Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.900, which suggesting that the stock is 9.971% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.976, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.369%.

Victory Capital Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.36%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Victory Capital Holdings pays 40.08% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Victory Capital Holdings quarterly revenues are $225.6M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $537.4M. Victory Capital Holdings's net income of $82M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M. Notably, Victory Capital Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.37x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 19.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Victory Capital Holdings is 5.03x versus 5.26x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.