SEIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 28.82% compared to SEI Investments's net margin of 21.43%. SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65% beat Federated Hermes's return on equity of 23.19%.

SEI Investments has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 0.19%. On the other hand Federated Hermes has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.6%. Given that Federated Hermes has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than SEI Investments.

SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, which suggesting that the stock is 1.657% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.522%.

SEI Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Federated Hermes offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. SEI Investments pays 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes pays out 32.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SEI Investments quarterly revenues are $537.4M, which are larger than Federated Hermes quarterly revenues of $408.5M. SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M is higher than Federated Hermes's net income of $87.5M. Notably, SEI Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.96x while Federated Hermes's PE ratio is 13.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEI Investments is 5.31x versus 2.07x for Federated Hermes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Global Investors has a net margin of 28.82% compared to SEI Investments's net margin of 14.6%. SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 3.67%.

SEI Investments has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 0.19%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SEI Investments has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than US Global Investors.

SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, which suggesting that the stock is 1.657% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.836, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.562%.

SEI Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. SEI Investments pays 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SEI Investments quarterly revenues are $537.4M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M is higher than US Global Investors's net income of $315K. Notably, SEI Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.96x while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 18.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEI Investments is 5.31x versus 3.38x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 28.82% compared to SEI Investments's net margin of 33.77%. SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.72%.

SEI Investments has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 0.19%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $115.79 which suggests that it could grow by 1.69%. Given that T. Rowe Price Group has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe T. Rowe Price Group is more attractive than SEI Investments.

SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, which suggesting that the stock is 1.657% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.235%.

SEI Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 4.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.24 per share. SEI Investments pays 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 62.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SEI Investments quarterly revenues are $537.4M, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $603M. Notably, SEI Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.96x while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 12.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEI Investments is 5.31x versus 3.68x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victory Capital Holdings has a net margin of 28.82% compared to SEI Investments's net margin of 36.34%. SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65% beat Victory Capital Holdings's return on equity of 24.27%.

SEI Investments has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 0.19%. On the other hand Victory Capital Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $71.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.12%. Given that Victory Capital Holdings has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe Victory Capital Holdings is more attractive than SEI Investments.

SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, which suggesting that the stock is 1.657% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victory Capital Holdings has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.217%.

SEI Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Victory Capital Holdings offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. SEI Investments pays 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Victory Capital Holdings pays out 40.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SEI Investments quarterly revenues are $537.4M, which are larger than Victory Capital Holdings quarterly revenues of $225.6M. SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M is higher than Victory Capital Holdings's net income of $82M. Notably, SEI Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.96x while Victory Capital Holdings's PE ratio is 16.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEI Investments is 5.31x versus 5.02x for Victory Capital Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.