EVR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Evercore's net margin of 23.88%. Evercore's return on equity of 24.79% beat Federated Hermes's return on equity of 25.83%.

Evercore has a consensus price target of $228.43, signalling downside risk potential of -5.44%. On the other hand Federated Hermes has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.09%. Given that Evercore has more downside risk than Federated Hermes, analysts believe Federated Hermes is more attractive than Evercore.

Evercore has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.777, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.281%.

Evercore has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Federated Hermes offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Evercore pays 35.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Federated Hermes pays out 68.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evercore quarterly revenues are $694.8M, which are larger than Federated Hermes quarterly revenues of $423.5M. Evercore's net income of $146.2M is higher than Federated Hermes's net income of $101.1M. Notably, Evercore's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.12x while Federated Hermes's PE ratio is 12.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evercore is 3.27x versus 2.05x for Federated Hermes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lazard has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Evercore's net margin of 9.18%. Evercore's return on equity of 24.79% beat Lazard's return on equity of 44.87%.

Evercore has a consensus price target of $228.43, signalling downside risk potential of -5.44%. On the other hand Lazard has an analysts' consensus of $43.33 which suggests that it could fall by -6.53%. Given that Lazard has more downside risk than Evercore, analysts believe Evercore is more attractive than Lazard.

Evercore has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lazard has a beta of 1.283, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.307%.

Evercore has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. Lazard offers a yield of 4.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Evercore pays 35.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Lazard pays out 63.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evercore quarterly revenues are $694.8M, which are larger than Lazard quarterly revenues of $657.5M. Evercore's net income of $146.2M is higher than Lazard's net income of $60.4M. Notably, Evercore's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.12x while Lazard's PE ratio is 16.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evercore is 3.27x versus 1.62x for Lazard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Evercore's net margin of -249.29%. Evercore's return on equity of 24.79% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39%.

Evercore has a consensus price target of $228.43, signalling downside risk potential of -5.44%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $19.88 which suggests that it could grow by 22.67%. Given that MARA Holdings has higher upside potential than Evercore, analysts believe MARA Holdings is more attractive than Evercore.

Evercore has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.822, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 582.181%.

Evercore has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Evercore pays 35.91% of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evercore's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evercore quarterly revenues are $694.8M, which are larger than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.9M. Evercore's net income of $146.2M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M. Notably, Evercore's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.12x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evercore is 3.27x versus 7.57x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 21.04% compared to Evercore's net margin of 27.48%. Evercore's return on equity of 24.79% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 26.44%.

Evercore has a consensus price target of $228.43, signalling downside risk potential of -5.44%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $85.20 which suggests that it could fall by -0.21%. Given that Evercore has more downside risk than SEI Investments, analysts believe SEI Investments is more attractive than Evercore.

Evercore has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.346% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.904, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.563%.

Evercore has a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.33%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Evercore pays 35.91% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 20.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Evercore quarterly revenues are $694.8M, which are larger than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $551.3M. Evercore's net income of $146.2M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $151.5M. Notably, Evercore's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.12x while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 18.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Evercore is 3.27x versus 5.16x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.