OCSL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of -121.48% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 27.77%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 26.85%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $15.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 0.828, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.209%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.8%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M is lower than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $7.4M. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.67x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 8.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 23.10x versus 2.41x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of -121.48% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 99.99%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $15.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.80 which suggests that it could grow by 2.53%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.874%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.8%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.67x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 23.10x versus 7.38x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KKR & has a net margin of -121.48% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 35.17%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66% beat KKR &'s return on equity of 5.17%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $15.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand KKR & has an analysts' consensus of $137.07 which suggests that it could grow by 32.91%. Given that KKR & has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe KKR & is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KKR & has a beta of 1.770, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.003%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.8%. KKR & offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR & pays out 19.9% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than KKR & quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M is lower than KKR &'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.67x while KKR &'s PE ratio is 31.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 23.10x versus 4.47x for KKR &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of -121.48% compared to Oaktree Specialty Lending's net margin of 90.38%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $15.67, signalling upside risk potential of 13.12%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.41 which suggests that it could grow by 29.09%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.845, which suggesting that the stock is 15.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.938%.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.8%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 13.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Oaktree Specialty Lending's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.67x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 8.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oaktree Specialty Lending is 23.10x versus 7.88x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.