APO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a net margin of 28.13% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of -3.92%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 15.98% beat Bridge Investment Group Holdings's return on equity of 1.54%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $161.38, signalling upside risk potential of 25.63%. On the other hand Bridge Investment Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $8.25 which suggests that it could fall by -8.03%. Given that Apollo Global Management has higher upside potential than Bridge Investment Group Holdings, analysts believe Apollo Global Management is more attractive than Bridge Investment Group Holdings.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.662, which suggesting that the stock is 66.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Bridge Investment Group Holdings offers a yield of 5.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 25.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Bridge Investment Group Holdings pays out 218.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Bridge Investment Group Holdings's is not.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Bridge Investment Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $103.4M. Apollo Global Management's net income of $1.5B is higher than Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net income of -$4M. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.57x while Bridge Investment Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 2.99x versus 1.81x for Bridge Investment Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blackstone has a net margin of 28.13% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of 26.04%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 15.98% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 14.74%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $161.38, signalling upside risk potential of 25.63%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $162.67 which suggests that it could grow by 18.42%. Given that Apollo Global Management has higher upside potential than Blackstone, analysts believe Apollo Global Management is more attractive than Blackstone.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.662, which suggesting that the stock is 66.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.611, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.056%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Blackstone offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.44 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 25.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 159.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blackstone's is not.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Apollo Global Management's net income of $1.5B is higher than Blackstone's net income of $703.9M. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.57x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 37.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 2.99x versus 9.63x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 28.13% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of 29.64%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 15.98% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity of 11.93%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $161.38, signalling upside risk potential of 25.63%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group has an analysts' consensus of $609.53 which suggests that it could grow by 17.93%. Given that Apollo Global Management has higher upside potential than The Goldman Sachs Group, analysts believe Apollo Global Management is more attractive than The Goldman Sachs Group.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.662, which suggesting that the stock is 66.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.076%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. The Goldman Sachs Group offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 25.98% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 31.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group quarterly revenues of $13.9B. Apollo Global Management's net income of $1.5B is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group's net income of $4.1B. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.57x while The Goldman Sachs Group's PE ratio is 12.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 2.99x versus 3.22x for The Goldman Sachs Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KKR & has a net margin of 28.13% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of 35.17%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 15.98% beat KKR &'s return on equity of 5.17%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $161.38, signalling upside risk potential of 25.63%. On the other hand KKR & has an analysts' consensus of $148.17 which suggests that it could grow by 34.14%. Given that KKR & has higher upside potential than Apollo Global Management, analysts believe KKR & is more attractive than Apollo Global Management.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.662, which suggesting that the stock is 66.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KKR & has a beta of 1.770, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.003%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. KKR & offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 25.98% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR & pays out 19.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than KKR & quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Apollo Global Management's net income of $1.5B is higher than KKR &'s net income of $1.1B. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.57x while KKR &'s PE ratio is 33.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 2.99x versus 4.79x for KKR &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.