APO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone has a net margin of 10.43% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of 27.05%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 22.46% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 11.9%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $182.82, signalling upside risk potential of 4.85%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $178.70 which suggests that it could grow by 1.27%. Given that Apollo Global Management has higher upside potential than Blackstone, analysts believe Apollo Global Management is more attractive than Blackstone.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.628, which suggesting that the stock is 62.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.510, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.041%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Blackstone offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 306.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blackstone's is not.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Apollo Global Management's net income of $811M is higher than Blackstone's net income of $780.8M. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 60.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 3.27x versus 14.44x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citigroup has a net margin of 10.43% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of 15.98%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 22.46% beat Citigroup's return on equity of 3.83%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $182.82, signalling upside risk potential of 4.85%. On the other hand Citigroup has an analysts' consensus of $72.14 which suggests that it could grow by 12.47%. Given that Citigroup has higher upside potential than Apollo Global Management, analysts believe Citigroup is more attractive than Apollo Global Management.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.628, which suggesting that the stock is 62.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citigroup has a beta of 1.448, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.751%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Citigroup offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Citigroup pays out 56.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are smaller than Citigroup quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Apollo Global Management's net income of $811M is lower than Citigroup's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while Citigroup's PE ratio is 20.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 3.27x versus 1.72x for Citigroup. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 10.43% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of 23.55%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 22.46% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity of 10.26%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $182.82, signalling upside risk potential of 4.85%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group has an analysts' consensus of $605.50 which suggests that it could grow by 4.18%. Given that Apollo Global Management has higher upside potential than The Goldman Sachs Group, analysts believe Apollo Global Management is more attractive than The Goldman Sachs Group.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.628, which suggesting that the stock is 62.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.781%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. The Goldman Sachs Group offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 49.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Apollo Global Management's net income of $811M is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group's net income of $3B. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while The Goldman Sachs Group's PE ratio is 17.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 3.27x versus 3.84x for The Goldman Sachs Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KKR & has a net margin of 10.43% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of 12.69%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 22.46% beat KKR &'s return on equity of 5.03%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $182.82, signalling upside risk potential of 4.85%. On the other hand KKR & has an analysts' consensus of $167.70 which suggests that it could grow by 9.95%. Given that KKR & has higher upside potential than Apollo Global Management, analysts believe KKR & is more attractive than Apollo Global Management.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.628, which suggesting that the stock is 62.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KKR & has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.328%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. KKR & offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR & pays out 16.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than KKR & quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Apollo Global Management's net income of $811M is higher than KKR &'s net income of $600.6M. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.22x while KKR &'s PE ratio is 47.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 3.27x versus 6.20x for KKR &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.