BRDG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Apollo Global Management has a net margin of -3.92% compared to Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net margin of 28.13%. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's return on equity of 1.54% beat Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 15.98%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling downside risk potential of -9.24%. On the other hand Apollo Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $155.12 which suggests that it could grow by 19.96%. Given that Apollo Global Management has higher upside potential than Bridge Investment Group Holdings, analysts believe Apollo Global Management is more attractive than Bridge Investment Group Holdings.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.671, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.126%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.06%. Apollo Global Management offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Bridge Investment Group Holdings pays 218.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management pays out 25.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Bridge Investment Group Holdings's is not.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.4M, which are smaller than Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net income of -$4M is lower than Apollo Global Management's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Bridge Investment Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Apollo Global Management's PE ratio is 17.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridge Investment Group Holdings is 1.83x versus 3.01x for Apollo Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blackstone has a net margin of -3.92% compared to Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net margin of 21.75%. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's return on equity of 1.54% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 13.25%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling downside risk potential of -9.24%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $145.38 which suggests that it could grow by 8.49%. Given that Blackstone has higher upside potential than Bridge Investment Group Holdings, analysts believe Blackstone is more attractive than Bridge Investment Group Holdings.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.367%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.06%. Blackstone offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Bridge Investment Group Holdings pays 218.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 159.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.4M, which are smaller than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net income of -$4M is lower than Blackstone's net income of $614.9M. Notably, Bridge Investment Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blackstone's PE ratio is 40.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridge Investment Group Holdings is 1.83x versus 9.63x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Global Investors has a net margin of -3.92% compared to Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net margin of -3.86%. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's return on equity of 1.54% beat US Global Investors's return on equity of 1.04%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling downside risk potential of -9.24%. On the other hand US Global Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bridge Investment Group Holdings has higher upside potential than US Global Investors, analysts believe Bridge Investment Group Holdings is more attractive than US Global Investors.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Investors has a beta of 1.487, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.661%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.06%. US Global Investors offers a yield of 4.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Bridge Investment Group Holdings pays 218.85% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors pays out 95.87% of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Investors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Bridge Investment Group Holdings's is not.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.4M, which are larger than US Global Investors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net income of -$4M is lower than US Global Investors's net income of -$86K. Notably, Bridge Investment Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while US Global Investors's PE ratio is 76.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridge Investment Group Holdings is 1.83x versus 3.08x for US Global Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of -3.92% compared to Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net margin of 1.3%. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's return on equity of 1.54% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of 9.43%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.25, signalling downside risk potential of -9.24%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.21%. Given that Principal Financial Group has higher upside potential than Bridge Investment Group Holdings, analysts believe Principal Financial Group is more attractive than Bridge Investment Group Holdings.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.088%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.06%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Bridge Investment Group Holdings pays 218.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 41.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Bridge Investment Group Holdings's is not.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $103.4M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net income of -$4M is lower than Principal Financial Group's net income of $48.1M. Notably, Bridge Investment Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 16.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridge Investment Group Holdings is 1.83x versus 1.12x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.