MFIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 90.38% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 99.99%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $14.03, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 1.97%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.718%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.51%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $26.6M, which are smaller than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $35.7M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.42x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 8.58x versus 7.52x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 90.38% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 91.13%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $14.03, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.86%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.552, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.846%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.51%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 11.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $26.6M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $86.7M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.42x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 12.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 8.58x versus 11.90x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 90.38% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 96.47%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 22.5%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $14.03, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand Gladstone Capital has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could grow by 5.3%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.35799999999999%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.51%. Gladstone Capital offers a yield of 7.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $26.6M, which are smaller than Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues of $26.9M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M is lower than Gladstone Capital's net income of $27.1M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.42x while Gladstone Capital's PE ratio is 4.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 8.58x versus 4.54x for Gladstone Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 90.38% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 90.2%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $14.03, signalling upside risk potential of 15.48%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.10 which suggests that it could grow by 3.22%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.64%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.51%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 15.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $26.6M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.42x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 105.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 8.58x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.