Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?
You know those companies that just refuse to slow down…
Buy
60
MFIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$12.96
Seasonality move
:
2.83%
Day range:
$12.73 - $12.98
52-week range:
$10.18 - $16.37
Dividend yield:
11.73%
P/E ratio:
10.62x
P/S ratio:
9.72x
P/B ratio:
0.87x
Volume:
331.7K
Avg. volume:
339.3K
1-year change:
-16.23%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$110.3M
EPS (TTM):
$1.22
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$82.5M | $0.38 | 224% | 7.66% | $13.91 |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
|
$25.9M | $0.23 | 18.64% | -62.26% | $13.90 |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
|
$223.8M | $0.41 | 22652.41% | 664% | $15.25 |
|
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
|
$101.1M | $0.46 | 120.13% | 17.31% | $11.08 |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
$84.4M | $0.49 | 724.72% | 4369% | $14.08 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$12.96 | $13.91 | $1.2B | 10.62x | $0.38 | 11.73% | 9.72x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
$142.65 | -- | $389.1M | 9.65x | $1.50 | 4.21% | 2.56x |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
|
$14.93 | $13.90 | $550M | 8.39x | $0.08 | 6.43% | 8.90x |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
|
$15.13 | $15.25 | $4B | 13.39x | $0.39 | 10.91% | 12.53x |
|
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
|
$11.25 | $11.08 | $1.3B | 25.00x | $0.48 | 14.84% | 19.29x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
$14.39 | $14.08 | $1.3B | 110.69x | $0.47 | 14.73% | 22.13x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
58.14% | 0.805 | 161.29% | 5.96x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
-- | 0.897 | -- | 3.21x |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
|
47.73% | 0.190 | 92.6% | 0.45x |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
|
54.31% | 0.218 | 118.1% | 1.84x |
|
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
|
54.73% | 0.575 | 137.16% | 1.38x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
49.55% | 0.335 | 107.06% | 1.24x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
-- | -- | 3.55% | 8.33% | 191.25% | -$131.3M |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
$18.9M | $13.1M | 24.93% | 24.93% | 31.14% | -$11.3M |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
|
-- | -- | 7.17% | 13.51% | 160.24% | $112.7M |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
|
-- | -- | 3.63% | 7.87% | 168.76% | $195.4M |
|
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
|
-- | -- | 1.49% | 3.28% | 174.2% | $133.9M |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
-- | -- | 0.29% | 0.61% | 19.39% | $62M |
MidCap Financial Investment vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 24.7%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 24.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment-- $0.32 $3.3B DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group45.11% $3.77 $169M -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or DHIL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.91, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment4 3 0 DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group0 0 0 -
Is MFIC or DHIL More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 0.752, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.85%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or DHIL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.73%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 4.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or DHIL?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $42M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $10.4M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 9.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.72x versus 2.56x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment9.72x 10.62x $31.8M $30.3M DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group2.56x 9.65x $42M $10.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or GAIN?
Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 99.99%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment-- $0.32 $3.3B GAINGladstone Investment-- $0.49 $954.8M -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or GAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.91, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.90 which suggests that it could fall by -6.9%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment4 3 0 GAINGladstone Investment2 3 0 -
Is MFIC or GAIN More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.718%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or GAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.73%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or GAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $16.8M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 8.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.72x versus 8.90x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment9.72x 10.62x $31.8M $30.3M GAINGladstone Investment8.90x 8.39x $16.8M $17.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or GBDC?
Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 91.13%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment-- $0.32 $3.3B GBDCGolub Capital BDC-- $0.30 $8.9B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.91, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $15.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.79%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment4 3 0 GBDCGolub Capital BDC2 2 0 -
Is MFIC or GBDC More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.552, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.846%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.73%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $86.7M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 13.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.72x versus 12.53x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment9.72x 10.62x $31.8M $30.3M GBDCGolub Capital BDC12.53x 13.39x $86.7M $79M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or GSBD?
Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 89.74%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 3.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment-- $0.32 $3.3B GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC-- $0.27 $3.4B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or GSBD?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.91, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Goldman Sachs BDC has an analysts' consensus of $11.08 which suggests that it could fall by -1.48%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Goldman Sachs BDC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment4 3 0 GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC0 3 1 -
Is MFIC or GSBD More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.834%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or GSBD?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.73%. Goldman Sachs BDC offers a yield of 14.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 314.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or GSBD?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs BDC quarterly revenues of $35.2M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is lower than Goldman Sachs BDC's net income of $31.6M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Goldman Sachs BDC's PE ratio is 25.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.72x versus 19.29x for Goldman Sachs BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment9.72x 10.62x $31.8M $30.3M GSBDGoldman Sachs BDC19.29x 25.00x $35.2M $31.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or OCSL?
Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 90.2%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment-- $0.32 $3.3B OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending-- -$0.42 $2.9B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.91, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could fall by -2.13%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment4 3 0 OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending1 5 0 -
Is MFIC or OCSL More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.64%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.73%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 110.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.72x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment9.72x 10.62x $31.8M $30.3M OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending22.13x 110.69x -$40.2M -$36.2M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
UPS Stock Forecast: Is the 6.9% Dividend Too Good to Be True?
Parcel delivery giant UPS (NYSE:UPS) has seen its fair share…
Where Will Coinbase Stock Be in 5 Years?
If you’ve been anywhere near the crypto world over the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
84
SBET alert for May 28
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is up 454.46% over the past day.
Buy
58
TNXP alert for May 28
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding [TNXP] is up 27.51% over the past day.
Sell
37
ATS alert for May 28
ATS [ATS] is up 19.57% over the past day.
