Financhill
Buy
60

MFIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$12.96
Seasonality move :
2.83%
Day range:
$12.73 - $12.98
52-week range:
$10.18 - $16.37
Dividend yield:
11.73%
P/E ratio:
10.62x
P/S ratio:
9.72x
P/B ratio:
0.87x
Volume:
331.7K
Avg. volume:
339.3K
1-year change:
-16.23%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$110.3M
EPS (TTM):
$1.22

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
$82.5M $0.38 224% 7.66% $13.91
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
-- -- -- -- --
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
$25.9M $0.23 18.64% -62.26% $13.90
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
$223.8M $0.41 22652.41% 664% $15.25
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
$101.1M $0.46 120.13% 17.31% $11.08
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
$84.4M $0.49 724.72% 4369% $14.08
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
$12.96 $13.91 $1.2B 10.62x $0.38 11.73% 9.72x
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
$142.65 -- $389.1M 9.65x $1.50 4.21% 2.56x
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
$14.93 $13.90 $550M 8.39x $0.08 6.43% 8.90x
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
$15.13 $15.25 $4B 13.39x $0.39 10.91% 12.53x
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
$11.25 $11.08 $1.3B 25.00x $0.48 14.84% 19.29x
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
$14.39 $14.08 $1.3B 110.69x $0.47 14.73% 22.13x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
58.14% 0.805 161.29% 5.96x
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
-- 0.897 -- 3.21x
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
47.73% 0.190 92.6% 0.45x
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
54.31% 0.218 118.1% 1.84x
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
54.73% 0.575 137.16% 1.38x
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
49.55% 0.335 107.06% 1.24x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
-- -- 3.55% 8.33% 191.25% -$131.3M
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
$18.9M $13.1M 24.93% 24.93% 31.14% -$11.3M
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
-- -- 7.17% 13.51% 160.24% $112.7M
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
-- -- 3.63% 7.87% 168.76% $195.4M
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
-- -- 1.49% 3.28% 174.2% $133.9M
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
-- -- 0.29% 0.61% 19.39% $62M

MidCap Financial Investment vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns MFIC or DHIL?

    Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 24.7%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 24.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    -- $0.32 $3.3B
    DHIL
    Diamond Hill Investment Group
    45.11% $3.77 $169M
  • What do Analysts Say About MFIC or DHIL?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.91, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    4 3 0
    DHIL
    Diamond Hill Investment Group
    0 0 0
  • Is MFIC or DHIL More Risky?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 0.752, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.85%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or DHIL?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.73%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 4.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or DHIL?

    MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $42M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $10.4M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 9.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.72x versus 2.56x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    9.72x 10.62x $31.8M $30.3M
    DHIL
    Diamond Hill Investment Group
    2.56x 9.65x $42M $10.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns MFIC or GAIN?

    Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 99.99%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    -- $0.32 $3.3B
    GAIN
    Gladstone Investment
    -- $0.49 $954.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About MFIC or GAIN?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.91, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.90 which suggests that it could fall by -6.9%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    4 3 0
    GAIN
    Gladstone Investment
    2 3 0
  • Is MFIC or GAIN More Risky?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.718%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or GAIN?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.73%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or GAIN?

    MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $16.8M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 8.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.72x versus 8.90x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    9.72x 10.62x $31.8M $30.3M
    GAIN
    Gladstone Investment
    8.90x 8.39x $16.8M $17.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns MFIC or GBDC?

    Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 91.13%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    -- $0.32 $3.3B
    GBDC
    Golub Capital BDC
    -- $0.30 $8.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About MFIC or GBDC?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.91, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $15.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.79%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    4 3 0
    GBDC
    Golub Capital BDC
    2 2 0
  • Is MFIC or GBDC More Risky?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.552, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.846%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or GBDC?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.73%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or GBDC?

    MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $86.7M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 13.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.72x versus 12.53x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    9.72x 10.62x $31.8M $30.3M
    GBDC
    Golub Capital BDC
    12.53x 13.39x $86.7M $79M
  • Which has Higher Returns MFIC or GSBD?

    Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 89.74%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 3.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    -- $0.32 $3.3B
    GSBD
    Goldman Sachs BDC
    -- $0.27 $3.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About MFIC or GSBD?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.91, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Goldman Sachs BDC has an analysts' consensus of $11.08 which suggests that it could fall by -1.48%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Goldman Sachs BDC.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    4 3 0
    GSBD
    Goldman Sachs BDC
    0 3 1
  • Is MFIC or GSBD More Risky?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.834%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or GSBD?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.73%. Goldman Sachs BDC offers a yield of 14.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 314.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or GSBD?

    MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs BDC quarterly revenues of $35.2M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is lower than Goldman Sachs BDC's net income of $31.6M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Goldman Sachs BDC's PE ratio is 25.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.72x versus 19.29x for Goldman Sachs BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    9.72x 10.62x $31.8M $30.3M
    GSBD
    Goldman Sachs BDC
    19.29x 25.00x $35.2M $31.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns MFIC or OCSL?

    Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 90.2%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    -- $0.32 $3.3B
    OCSL
    Oaktree Specialty Lending
    -- -$0.42 $2.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About MFIC or OCSL?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.91, signalling upside risk potential of 7.3%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could fall by -2.13%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    4 3 0
    OCSL
    Oaktree Specialty Lending
    1 5 0
  • Is MFIC or OCSL More Risky?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.64%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or OCSL?

    MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.73%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or OCSL?

    MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.62x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 110.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.72x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MFIC
    MidCap Financial Investment
    9.72x 10.62x $31.8M $30.3M
    OCSL
    Oaktree Specialty Lending
    22.13x 110.69x -$40.2M -$36.2M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?

You know those companies that just refuse to slow down…

UPS Stock Forecast: Is the 6.9% Dividend Too Good to Be True?
UPS Stock Forecast: Is the 6.9% Dividend Too Good to Be True?

Parcel delivery giant UPS (NYSE:UPS) has seen its fair share…

Where Will Coinbase Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Coinbase Stock Be in 5 Years?

If you’ve been anywhere near the crypto world over the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
84
SBET alert for May 28

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is up 454.46% over the past day.

Buy
58
TNXP alert for May 28

Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding [TNXP] is up 27.51% over the past day.

Sell
37
ATS alert for May 28

ATS [ATS] is up 19.57% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock