GBDC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 91.13% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 99.99%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $15.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.42%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.90 which suggests that it could fall by -4.93%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.552, which suggesting that the stock is 44.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.718%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.08%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $86.7M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $16.8M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.18x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 8.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 12.33x versus 8.71x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 91.13% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 96.47%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 18.67%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $15.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.42%. On the other hand Gladstone Capital has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.27%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.552, which suggesting that the stock is 44.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.35799999999999%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.08%. Gladstone Capital offers a yield of 7.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $86.7M, which are larger than Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues of $8.4M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M is higher than Gladstone Capital's net income of $9M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.18x while Gladstone Capital's PE ratio is 6.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 12.33x versus 6.50x for Gladstone Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 91.13% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 95.41%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $15.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.42%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.91 which suggests that it could grow by 10.02%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.552, which suggesting that the stock is 44.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.40500000000001%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.08%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 12.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $86.7M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $31.8M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.18x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 12.33x versus 9.48x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 91.13% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 90.2%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $15.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.42%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could grow by 0.38%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.552, which suggesting that the stock is 44.846% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.64%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.08%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 15.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $86.7M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.18x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 107.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 12.33x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.