Is Ginkgo Bioworks Stock a Good Buy?
Biotech innovator Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:DNA) has had better…
Buy
52
IVFH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.52
Seasonality move
:
4.12%
Day range:
$1.48 - $1.55
52-week range:
$1.09 - $2.50
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
50.80x
P/S ratio:
1.04x
P/B ratio:
10.52x
Volume:
51.6K
Avg. volume:
55.9K
1-year change:
36.02%
Market cap:
$82.5M
Revenue:
$72.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVFH
Innovative Food Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACI
Albertsons Companies
|
$18.8B | $0.41 | 1.66% | 29.87% | $24.29 |
|
CHEF
The Chefs' Warehouse
|
$926.6M | $0.19 | 6.1% | 24.07% | $69.50 |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPTN
SpartanNash
|
$2.9B | $0.43 | 2.22% | 15.14% | $20.50 |
|
UNFI
United Natural Foods
|
$7.8B | $0.21 | 3.81% | -97.82% | $30.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVFH
Innovative Food Holdings
|
$1.52 | -- | $82.5M | 50.80x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.04x |
|
ACI
Albertsons Companies
|
$21.84 | $24.29 | $12.6B | 13.32x | $0.15 | 2.47% | 0.16x |
|
CHEF
The Chefs' Warehouse
|
$64.80 | $69.50 | $2.6B | 42.91x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.77x |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
$111.84 | -- | $72.2M | 44.92x | $0.18 | 0.64% | 0.02x |
|
SPTN
SpartanNash
|
$19.74 | $20.50 | $666.5M | 15.77x | $0.22 | 4.42% | 0.07x |
|
UNFI
United Natural Foods
|
$30.36 | $30.00 | $1.8B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.06x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVFH
Innovative Food Holdings
|
52.98% | 1.486 | 9.23% | 1.11x |
|
ACI
Albertsons Companies
|
68.59% | 0.013 | 61.06% | 0.16x |
|
CHEF
The Chefs' Warehouse
|
56.42% | 1.397 | 31.66% | 1.11x |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
59.18% | 1.080 | 213.19% | 0.72x |
|
SPTN
SpartanNash
|
50.35% | -0.376 | 121.91% | 0.68x |
|
UNFI
United Natural Foods
|
56.11% | 2.522 | 116.55% | 0.45x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IVFH
Innovative Food Holdings
|
$4.5M | -$223.2K | 5.11% | 12.42% | -1.13% | -$1.1M |
|
ACI
Albertsons Companies
|
$5.1B | $312.4M | 8.87% | 31.06% | 1.67% | $274M |
|
CHEF
The Chefs' Warehouse
|
$226M | $22.7M | 5.28% | 12.93% | 2.39% | $37.2M |
|
DIT
Amcon Distributing
|
$43M | $461.9K | 0.55% | 1.34% | 0.04% | $31.4M |
|
SPTN
SpartanNash
|
$364.5M | $29M | 0.02% | 0.04% | -1.22% | $48.1M |
|
UNFI
United Natural Foods
|
$1.1B | $41M | -2.15% | -4.96% | 0.39% | $193M |
Innovative Food Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IVFH or ACI?
Albertsons Companies has a net margin of -2.2% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of 0.91%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 12.42% beat Albertsons Companies's return on equity of 31.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVFHInnovative Food Holdings22.95% -$0.01 $16.7M ACIAlbertsons Companies27.39% $0.29 $10.8B -
What do Analysts Say About IVFH or ACI?
Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Albertsons Companies has an analysts' consensus of $24.29 which suggests that it could grow by 12.31%. Given that Albertsons Companies has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe Albertsons Companies is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVFHInnovative Food Holdings0 0 0 ACIAlbertsons Companies5 9 0 -
Is IVFH or ACI More Risky?
Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.023, which suggesting that the stock is 97.7% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Albertsons Companies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVFH or ACI?
Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Albertsons Companies offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Albertsons Companies pays out 30.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Albertsons Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVFH or ACI?
Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.5M, which are smaller than Albertsons Companies quarterly revenues of $18.8B. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of -$430.4K is lower than Albertsons Companies's net income of $171.8M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.80x while Albertsons Companies's PE ratio is 13.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.04x versus 0.16x for Albertsons Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVFHInnovative Food Holdings1.04x 50.80x $19.5M -$430.4K ACIAlbertsons Companies0.16x 13.32x $18.8B $171.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVFH or CHEF?
The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of -2.2% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of 1.08%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 12.42% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 12.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVFHInnovative Food Holdings22.95% -$0.01 $16.7M CHEFThe Chefs' Warehouse23.77% $0.25 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About IVFH or CHEF?
Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $69.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.25%. Given that The Chefs' Warehouse has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe The Chefs' Warehouse is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVFHInnovative Food Holdings0 0 0 CHEFThe Chefs' Warehouse6 0 0 -
Is IVFH or CHEF More Risky?
Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.023, which suggesting that the stock is 97.7% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.756, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.597%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVFH or CHEF?
Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVFH or CHEF?
Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.5M, which are smaller than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $950.7M. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of -$430.4K is lower than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $10.3M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.80x while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 42.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.04x versus 0.77x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVFHInnovative Food Holdings1.04x 50.80x $19.5M -$430.4K CHEFThe Chefs' Warehouse0.77x 42.91x $950.7M $10.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVFH or DIT?
Amcon Distributing has a net margin of -2.2% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of -0.26%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 12.42% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 1.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVFHInnovative Food Holdings22.95% -$0.01 $16.7M DITAmcon Distributing6.95% -$2.58 $272.8M -
What do Analysts Say About IVFH or DIT?
Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Innovative Food Holdings has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Innovative Food Holdings is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVFHInnovative Food Holdings0 0 0 DITAmcon Distributing0 0 0 -
Is IVFH or DIT More Risky?
Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.023, which suggesting that the stock is 97.7% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.189%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVFH or DIT?
Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVFH or DIT?
Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.5M, which are smaller than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $619.5M. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of -$430.4K is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.80x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 44.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.04x versus 0.02x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVFHInnovative Food Holdings1.04x 50.80x $19.5M -$430.4K DITAmcon Distributing0.02x 44.92x $619.5M -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVFH or SPTN?
SpartanNash has a net margin of -2.2% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of -1.55%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 12.42% beat SpartanNash's return on equity of 0.04%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVFHInnovative Food Holdings22.95% -$0.01 $16.7M SPTNSpartanNash16.12% -$1.04 $1.5B -
What do Analysts Say About IVFH or SPTN?
Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SpartanNash has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3.85%. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVFHInnovative Food Holdings0 0 0 SPTNSpartanNash0 5 0 -
Is IVFH or SPTN More Risky?
Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.023, which suggesting that the stock is 97.7% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SpartanNash has a beta of 0.421, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.868%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVFH or SPTN?
Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SpartanNash offers a yield of 4.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash pays out 10003.01% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVFH or SPTN?
Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.5M, which are smaller than SpartanNash quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of -$430.4K is higher than SpartanNash's net income of -$35.1M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.80x while SpartanNash's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.04x versus 0.07x for SpartanNash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVFHInnovative Food Holdings1.04x 50.80x $19.5M -$430.4K SPTNSpartanNash0.07x 15.77x $2.3B -$35.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns IVFH or UNFI?
United Natural Foods has a net margin of -2.2% compared to Innovative Food Holdings's net margin of -0.04%. Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 12.42% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IVFHInnovative Food Holdings22.95% -$0.01 $16.7M UNFIUnited Natural Foods13.14% -$0.05 $3.7B -
What do Analysts Say About IVFH or UNFI?
Innovative Food Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could fall by -1.19%. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IVFHInnovative Food Holdings0 0 0 UNFIUnited Natural Foods1 8 1 -
Is IVFH or UNFI More Risky?
Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.023, which suggesting that the stock is 97.7% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.223%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IVFH or UNFI?
Innovative Food Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Innovative Food Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IVFH or UNFI?
Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues are $19.5M, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Innovative Food Holdings's net income of -$430.4K is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M. Notably, Innovative Food Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 50.80x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Innovative Food Holdings is 1.04x versus 0.06x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IVFHInnovative Food Holdings1.04x 50.80x $19.5M -$430.4K UNFIUnited Natural Foods0.06x -- $8.2B -$3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Mobileye Might Be Wall Street’s Next Big Surprise
The trend to automate vehicles started long ago when adding…
Why Is Rigetti Stock Going Up?
Quantum computing firm Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ:RGTI) has been one of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
99
SOC alert for May 20
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 14.35% over the past day.
Buy
52
RGC alert for May 20
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is down 10.93% over the past day.
Sell
40
GWLIF alert for May 20
Great-West Lifeco [GWLIF] is down 10.31% over the past day.
