SPTN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 0.49% compared to SpartanNash's net margin of 1.51%. SpartanNash's return on equity of 5.86% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 10.43%.

SpartanNash has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.19%. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $53.13 which suggests that it could grow by 8.89%. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than The Chefs' Warehouse, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than The Chefs' Warehouse.

SpartanNash has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.539% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.995%.

SpartanNash has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SpartanNash pays 56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SpartanNash quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $931.5M. SpartanNash's net income of $10.9M is lower than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $14.1M. Notably, SpartanNash's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.92x while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 42.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpartanNash is 0.07x versus 0.64x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 0.49% compared to SpartanNash's net margin of 0.17%. SpartanNash's return on equity of 5.86% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 4.01%.

SpartanNash has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.19%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

SpartanNash has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.539% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.577%.

SpartanNash has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. SpartanNash pays 56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SpartanNash quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $746.3M. SpartanNash's net income of $10.9M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of $1.2M. Notably, SpartanNash's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.92x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 18.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpartanNash is 0.07x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovative Food Holdings has a net margin of 0.49% compared to SpartanNash's net margin of 7.85%. SpartanNash's return on equity of 5.86% beat Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 22.76%.

SpartanNash has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.19%. On the other hand Innovative Food Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.

SpartanNash has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.539% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.187, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.252%.

SpartanNash has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. Innovative Food Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SpartanNash pays 56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Food Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SpartanNash quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues of $17M. SpartanNash's net income of $10.9M is higher than Innovative Food Holdings's net income of $1.3M. Notably, SpartanNash's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.92x while Innovative Food Holdings's PE ratio is 66.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpartanNash is 0.07x versus 1.26x for Innovative Food Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 0.49% compared to SpartanNash's net margin of -0.27%. SpartanNash's return on equity of 5.86% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -5.64%.

SpartanNash has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 24.19%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.44%. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

SpartanNash has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.539% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.692%.

SpartanNash has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.7%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SpartanNash pays 56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SpartanNash quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $7.9B. SpartanNash's net income of $10.9M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$21M. Notably, SpartanNash's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.92x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpartanNash is 0.07x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.