LNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Cheniere Energy's net margin of 6.29%. Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 33.43% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.65%.

Cheniere Energy has a consensus price target of $256.86, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $22.60 which suggests that it could grow by 25.53%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Cheniere Energy, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Cheniere Energy.

Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.415, which suggesting that the stock is 58.511% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.928%.

Cheniere Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 7.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Cheniere Energy pays 12.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $21B. Cheniere Energy's net income of $353M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Cheniere Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.06x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 13.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheniere Energy is 3.13x versus 0.75x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Fortress Energy has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Cheniere Energy's net margin of -41.95%. Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 33.43% beat New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -27.66%.

Cheniere Energy has a consensus price target of $256.86, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand New Fortress Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.33 which suggests that it could grow by 214.08%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Cheniere Energy, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Cheniere Energy.

Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.415, which suggesting that the stock is 58.511% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.459, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.875%.

Cheniere Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. New Fortress Energy offers a yield of 12.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Cheniere Energy pays 12.67% of its earnings as a dividend. New Fortress Energy pays out -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues of $470.5M. Cheniere Energy's net income of $353M is higher than New Fortress Energy's net income of -$197.4M. Notably, Cheniere Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.06x while New Fortress Energy's PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheniere Energy is 3.13x versus 0.36x for New Fortress Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vonage Holdings has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Cheniere Energy's net margin of --. Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 33.43% beat Vonage Holdings's return on equity of --.

Cheniere Energy has a consensus price target of $256.86, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand Vonage Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cheniere Energy has higher upside potential than Vonage Holdings, analysts believe Cheniere Energy is more attractive than Vonage Holdings.

Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.415, which suggesting that the stock is 58.511% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vonage Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cheniere Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Vonage Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cheniere Energy pays 12.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Vonage Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Vonage Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Cheniere Energy's net income of $353M is higher than Vonage Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Cheniere Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.06x while Vonage Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheniere Energy is 3.13x versus -- for Vonage Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams Companies has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Cheniere Energy's net margin of 22.67%. Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 33.43% beat Williams Companies's return on equity of 15.38%.

Cheniere Energy has a consensus price target of $256.86, signalling upside risk potential of 10.14%. On the other hand Williams Companies has an analysts' consensus of $60.22 which suggests that it could grow by 2.87%. Given that Cheniere Energy has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Cheniere Energy is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.415, which suggesting that the stock is 58.511% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams Companies has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.614%.

Cheniere Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Williams Companies offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cheniere Energy pays 12.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams Companies pays out 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Williams Companies quarterly revenues of $3B. Cheniere Energy's net income of $353M is lower than Williams Companies's net income of $691M. Notably, Cheniere Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.06x while Williams Companies's PE ratio is 31.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cheniere Energy is 3.13x versus 6.64x for Williams Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.