ET Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DT Midstream has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 29.32%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.55% beat DT Midstream's return on equity of 8.03%.

Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $23.03, signalling upside risk potential of 39.05%. On the other hand DT Midstream has an analysts' consensus of $105.31 which suggests that it could grow by 13.34%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than DT Midstream, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than DT Midstream.

Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DT Midstream has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.76%. DT Midstream offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. DT Midstream pays out 79.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than DT Midstream quarterly revenues of $249M. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.1B is higher than DT Midstream's net income of $73M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while DT Midstream's PE ratio is 25.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.68x versus 9.33x for DT Midstream. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enterprise Products Partners LP has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 11.41%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.55% beat Enterprise Products Partners LP's return on equity of 20.38%.

Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $23.03, signalling upside risk potential of 39.05%. On the other hand Enterprise Products Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $36.77 which suggests that it could grow by 22.29%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Enterprise Products Partners LP, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Enterprise Products Partners LP.

Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enterprise Products Partners LP has a beta of 0.783, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.737%.

Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.76%. Enterprise Products Partners LP offers a yield of 6.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Enterprise Products Partners LP pays out 76.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Enterprise Products Partners LP quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.1B is lower than Enterprise Products Partners LP's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Enterprise Products Partners LP's PE ratio is 11.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.68x versus 1.17x for Enterprise Products Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 22.02%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.55% beat Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 35.87%.

Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $23.03, signalling upside risk potential of 39.05%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy has an analysts' consensus of $253.83 which suggests that it could grow by 13.81%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Cheniere Energy, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Cheniere Energy.

Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.665, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.482%.

Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.76%. Cheniere Energy offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy pays out 12.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.1B is higher than Cheniere Energy's net income of $977M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Cheniere Energy's PE ratio is 15.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.68x versus 3.26x for Cheniere Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Williams Companies has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Energy Transfer LP's net margin of 17.72%. Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.55% beat Williams Companies's return on equity of 14.98%.

Energy Transfer LP has a consensus price target of $23.03, signalling upside risk potential of 39.05%. On the other hand Williams Companies has an analysts' consensus of $59.69 which suggests that it could grow by 5.76%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.592% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Williams Companies has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.689%.

Energy Transfer LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.76%. Williams Companies offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Energy Transfer LP pays 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Williams Companies pays out 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Williams Companies quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.1B is higher than Williams Companies's net income of $486M. Notably, Energy Transfer LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.94x while Williams Companies's PE ratio is 31.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Transfer LP is 0.68x versus 6.57x for Williams Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.