WMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Excelerate Energy has a net margin of 17.72% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 3.98%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 14.98% beat Excelerate Energy's return on equity of 1.78%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $59.69, signalling upside risk potential of 1.82%. On the other hand Excelerate Energy has an analysts' consensus of $32.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.35%. Given that Excelerate Energy has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Excelerate Energy is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Excelerate Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. Excelerate Energy offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy pays out 78.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Excelerate Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Excelerate Energy quarterly revenues of $274.6M. Williams Companies's net income of $486M is higher than Excelerate Energy's net income of $10.9M. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.21x while Excelerate Energy's PE ratio is 21.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.83x versus 0.81x for Excelerate Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Energy Transfer LP has a net margin of 17.72% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 5.51%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 14.98% beat Energy Transfer LP's return on equity of 10.55%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $59.69, signalling upside risk potential of 1.82%. On the other hand Energy Transfer LP has an analysts' consensus of $23.03 which suggests that it could grow by 33.33%. Given that Energy Transfer LP has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Energy Transfer LP is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Transfer LP has a beta of 1.326, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.592%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. Energy Transfer LP offers a yield of 7.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP pays out 96.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Transfer LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Energy Transfer LP quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Williams Companies's net income of $486M is lower than Energy Transfer LP's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.21x while Energy Transfer LP's PE ratio is 13.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.83x versus 0.71x for Energy Transfer LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 17.72% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 16.91%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 14.98% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.13%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $59.69, signalling upside risk potential of 1.82%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.30 which suggests that it could grow by 11.8%. Given that Kinder Morgan has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Kinder Morgan is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.499%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Williams Companies's net income of $486M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $717M. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.21x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 23.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.83x versus 3.88x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cheniere Energy has a net margin of 17.72% compared to Williams Companies's net margin of 22.02%. Williams Companies's return on equity of 14.98% beat Cheniere Energy's return on equity of 35.87%.

Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $59.69, signalling upside risk potential of 1.82%. On the other hand Cheniere Energy has an analysts' consensus of $254.18 which suggests that it could grow by 9.82%. Given that Cheniere Energy has higher upside potential than Williams Companies, analysts believe Cheniere Energy is more attractive than Williams Companies.

Williams Companies has a beta of 0.873, which suggesting that the stock is 12.689% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheniere Energy has a beta of 0.665, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.482%.

Williams Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. Cheniere Energy offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Williams Companies pays 104.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy pays out 12.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheniere Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Williams Companies's is not.

Williams Companies quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Cheniere Energy quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Williams Companies's net income of $486M is lower than Cheniere Energy's net income of $977M. Notably, Williams Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.21x while Cheniere Energy's PE ratio is 16.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Williams Companies is 6.83x versus 3.38x for Cheniere Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.