NFE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Black Hills has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 16.43%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.04%. On the other hand Black Hills has an analysts' consensus of $65.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.01%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Black Hills.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.523, which suggesting that the stock is 52.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Black Hills has a beta of 0.640, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.978%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.03%. Black Hills offers a yield of 4.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills pays out 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are larger than Black Hills quarterly revenues of $597.1M. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than Black Hills's net income of $98.1M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Black Hills's PE ratio is 15.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.46x versus 1.98x for Black Hills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 1.61%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.04%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $4.97 which suggests that it could grow by 268.06%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than New Fortress Energy, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than New Fortress Energy.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.523, which suggesting that the stock is 52.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.03%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are larger than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $80M. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 67.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.46x versus 0.12x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 19.31%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.04%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.34%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than RGC Resources.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.523, which suggesting that the stock is 52.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.149%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.03%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $27.3M. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 18.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.46x versus 2.58x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 17.99%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.07%.

New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 161.04%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $79.31 which suggests that it could grow by 12.94%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Sempra.

New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.523, which suggesting that the stock is 52.255% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.654, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.569%.

New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.03%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than Sempra's net income of $676M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Sempra's PE ratio is 15.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 0.46x versus 3.40x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.