OPAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Black Hills has a net margin of 1.61% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of 16.43%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4% beat Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.97, signalling upside risk potential of 150.95%. On the other hand Black Hills has an analysts' consensus of $65.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.69%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Black Hills.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Black Hills has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.419%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Black Hills offers a yield of 4.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills pays out 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $80M, which are smaller than Black Hills quarterly revenues of $597.1M. OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M is lower than Black Hills's net income of $98.1M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.00x while Black Hills's PE ratio is 15.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.18x versus 2.02x for Black Hills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 1.61% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of 17.05%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4% beat Chesapeake Utilities's return on equity of 9.05%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.97, signalling upside risk potential of 150.95%. On the other hand Chesapeake Utilities has an analysts' consensus of $135.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.25%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Chesapeake Utilities, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Chesapeake Utilities.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.449%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chesapeake Utilities offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 45.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $80M, which are smaller than Chesapeake Utilities quarterly revenues of $215M. OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M is lower than Chesapeake Utilities's net income of $36.7M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.00x while Chesapeake Utilities's PE ratio is 25.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.18x versus 3.82x for Chesapeake Utilities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 1.61% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of 19.31%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.97, signalling upside risk potential of 150.95%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.17%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than RGC Resources.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.457, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.286%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $80M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $27.3M. OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M is lower than RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.00x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 18.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.18x versus 2.52x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 1.61% compared to OPAL Fuels's net margin of 17.99%. OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.07%.

OPAL Fuels has a consensus price target of $4.97, signalling upside risk potential of 150.95%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $79.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.9%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Sempra.

OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.557%.

OPAL Fuels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. OPAL Fuels pays 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues are $80M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M is lower than Sempra's net income of $676M. Notably, OPAL Fuels's price-to-earnings ratio is 99.00x while Sempra's PE ratio is 16.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OPAL Fuels is 0.18x versus 3.63x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.