RGCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Black Hills has a net margin of 19.31% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 16.43%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07% beat Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand Black Hills has an analysts' consensus of $65.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.41%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Black Hills.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.457, which suggesting that the stock is 54.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Black Hills has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.419%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Black Hills offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills pays out 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are smaller than Black Hills quarterly revenues of $597.1M. RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M is lower than Black Hills's net income of $98.1M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.43x while Black Hills's PE ratio is 15.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.52x versus 1.93x for Black Hills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 19.31% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 17.05%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07% beat Chesapeake Utilities's return on equity of 9.05%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand Chesapeake Utilities has an analysts' consensus of $135.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.72%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Chesapeake Utilities, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Chesapeake Utilities.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.457, which suggesting that the stock is 54.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.449%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Chesapeake Utilities offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 45.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are smaller than Chesapeake Utilities quarterly revenues of $215M. RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M is lower than Chesapeake Utilities's net income of $36.7M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.43x while Chesapeake Utilities's PE ratio is 24.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.52x versus 3.73x for Chesapeake Utilities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 19.31% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 1.61%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $4.84 which suggests that it could grow by 106.17%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than RGC Resources.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.457, which suggesting that the stock is 54.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are smaller than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $80M. RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.43x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 120.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.52x versus 0.22x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 19.31% compared to RGC Resources's net margin of 17.99%. RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.07%.

RGC Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 25.23%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $79.75 which suggests that it could grow by 4.92%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Sempra.

RGC Resources has a beta of 0.457, which suggesting that the stock is 54.286% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.557%.

RGC Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.78%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. RGC Resources pays 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RGC Resources quarterly revenues are $27.3M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M is lower than Sempra's net income of $676M. Notably, RGC Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.43x while Sempra's PE ratio is 17.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RGC Resources is 2.52x versus 3.67x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.