BKH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 16.43% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 1.61%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.49%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $4.97 which suggests that it could grow by 152.22%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $597.1M, which are larger than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $80M. Black Hills's net income of $98.1M is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 98.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 2.01x versus 0.18x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 16.43% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 19.31%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.49%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.57%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.457, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.286%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $597.1M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $27.3M. Black Hills's net income of $98.1M is higher than RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 17.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 2.01x versus 2.45x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 16.43% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 17.99%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.07%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.49%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $79.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.49%. Given that Black Hills has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe Black Hills is more attractive than Sempra.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.557%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $597.1M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Black Hills's net income of $98.1M is lower than Sempra's net income of $676M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while Sempra's PE ratio is 17.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 2.01x versus 3.65x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UGI has a net margin of 16.43% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 18.47%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat UGI's return on equity of 12.01%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.00, signalling upside risk potential of 6.49%. On the other hand UGI has an analysts' consensus of $37.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.38%. Given that UGI has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe UGI is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.736, which suggesting that the stock is 26.419% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UGI has a beta of 1.050, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.983%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.3%. UGI offers a yield of 4.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. UGI pays out 118.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UGI's is not.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $597.1M, which are smaller than UGI quarterly revenues of $2B. Black Hills's net income of $98.1M is lower than UGI's net income of $375M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.57x while UGI's PE ratio is 13.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 2.01x versus 1.01x for UGI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.