OKTA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Box has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of 69.41%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat Box's return on equity of 290.83%.

Okta has a consensus price target of $117.03, signalling upside risk potential of 24.07%. On the other hand Box has an analysts' consensus of $34.44 which suggests that it could grow by 15.62%. Given that Okta has higher upside potential than Box, analysts believe Okta is more attractive than Box.

Okta has a beta of 1.068, which suggesting that the stock is 6.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Box has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.987%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Box offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Box pays out 6.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Box's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are larger than Box quarterly revenues of $279.5M. Okta's net income of $23M is lower than Box's net income of $194M. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,358.25x while Box's PE ratio is 22.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 6.36x versus 4.06x for Box. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of 25.09%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 25.78%.

Okta has a consensus price target of $117.03, signalling upside risk potential of 24.07%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $311.08 which suggests that it could grow by 20.5%. Given that Okta has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Okta is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Okta has a beta of 1.068, which suggesting that the stock is 6.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.138, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.826%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are smaller than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Okta's net income of $23M is lower than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $340.2M. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,358.25x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 66.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 6.36x versus 15.23x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of -8.72%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68%.

Okta has a consensus price target of $117.03, signalling upside risk potential of 24.07%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $408.89 which suggests that it could grow by 10.98%. Given that Okta has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Okta is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Okta has a beta of 1.068, which suggesting that the stock is 6.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.278, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.752%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are smaller than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Okta's net income of $23M is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,358.25x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 6.36x versus 23.16x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 3.37% compared to Okta's net margin of 34.62%. Okta's return on equity of 0.46% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Okta has a consensus price target of $117.03, signalling upside risk potential of 24.07%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $493.34 which suggests that it could grow by 34.49%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Okta.

Okta has a beta of 1.068, which suggesting that the stock is 6.826% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29399999999999%.

Okta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Okta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Okta quarterly revenues are $682M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Okta's net income of $23M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Okta's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,358.25x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 29.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Okta is 6.36x versus 10.47x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.