Financhill
Buy
55

MSFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$434.80
Seasonality move :
7.92%
Day range:
$428.63 - $443.74
52-week range:
$366.50 - $468.35
Dividend yield:
0.71%
P/E ratio:
36.02x
P/S ratio:
12.83x
P/B ratio:
11.28x
Volume:
54.1M
Avg. volume:
22.8M
1-year change:
17.8%
Market cap:
$3.2T
Revenue:
$245.1B
EPS (TTM):
$12.12

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
MSFT
Microsoft
$64.6B $3.11 11.05% 7.23% $507.50
ADBE
Adobe
$5.5B $4.67 9.3% 265.61% $586.00
CRM
Salesforce
$9.3B $2.45 8.07% 77.87% $394.98
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings
$983.1M $0.81 22.39% 290.75% $375.18
MSTR
MicroStrategy
$121.5M -$0.02 -1.46% -88.91% --
UBER
Uber Technologies
$11B $0.63 18.52% 9.24% $90.05
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
MSFT
Microsoft
$436.60 $507.50 $3.2T 36.02x $0.83 0.71% 12.83x
ADBE
Adobe
$447.17 $586.00 $196.8B 36.06x $0.00 0% 9.35x
CRM
Salesforce
$343.65 $394.98 $328.9B 56.52x $0.40 0.47% 9.02x
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings
$362.29 $375.18 $89.2B 710.37x $0.00 0% 24.09x
MSTR
MicroStrategy
$364.20 -- $81.8B -- $0.00 0% 151.04x
UBER
Uber Technologies
$60.73 $90.05 $127.9B 30.21x $0.00 0% 3.08x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
MSFT
Microsoft
13.56% 1.376 1.41% 1.06x
ADBE
Adobe
28.52% 0.988 2.48% 0.95x
CRM
Salesforce
12.59% 1.105 3.03% 0.90x
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings
19.56% 2.455 1.02% 1.69x
MSTR
MicroStrategy
52.75% 8.686 12.33% 0.53x
UBER
Uber Technologies
42.64% 2.239 6.87% 1.22x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
MSFT
Microsoft
$45.5B $30.6B 28.71% 35.68% 47.04% $19.3B
ADBE
Adobe
$5B $2B 27.91% 36.84% 36.41% $2.9B
CRM
Salesforce
$7.3B $1.9B 8.76% 10.11% 20.64% $1.8B
CRWD
CrowdStrike Holdings
$755.1M -$55.7M 3.8% 4.89% -0.39% $231.2M
MSTR
MicroStrategy
$81.7M -$20.5M -7.26% -16.93% -396.78% -$1.6B
UBER
Uber Technologies
$4.4B $1.1B 19.2% 33.34% 26.03% $2.1B

Microsoft vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns MSFT or ADBE?

    Adobe has a net margin of 37.61% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 30.02%. Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68% beat Adobe's return on equity of 36.84%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    69.35% $3.30 $332.8B
    ADBE
    Adobe
    89.01% $3.79 $19.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About MSFT or ADBE?

    Microsoft has a consensus price target of $507.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.24%. On the other hand Adobe has an analysts' consensus of $586.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.05%. Given that Adobe has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Adobe is more attractive than Microsoft.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    37 5 0
    ADBE
    Adobe
    19 9 1
  • Is MSFT or ADBE More Risky?

    Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.139% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adobe has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.088%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSFT or ADBE?

    Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Adobe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Adobe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MSFT or ADBE?

    Microsoft quarterly revenues are $65.6B, which are larger than Adobe quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Microsoft's net income of $24.7B is higher than Adobe's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while Adobe's PE ratio is 36.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 12.83x versus 9.35x for Adobe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    12.83x 36.02x $65.6B $24.7B
    ADBE
    Adobe
    9.35x 36.06x $5.6B $1.7B
  • Which has Higher Returns MSFT or CRM?

    Salesforce has a net margin of 37.61% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 16.17%. Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.11%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    69.35% $3.30 $332.8B
    CRM
    Salesforce
    77.71% $1.58 $67B
  • What do Analysts Say About MSFT or CRM?

    Microsoft has a consensus price target of $507.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.24%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $394.98 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Salesforce, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Salesforce.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    37 5 0
    CRM
    Salesforce
    22 13 0
  • Is MSFT or CRM More Risky?

    Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.139% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.388%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSFT or CRM?

    Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MSFT or CRM?

    Microsoft quarterly revenues are $65.6B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.4B. Microsoft's net income of $24.7B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 56.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 12.83x versus 9.02x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    12.83x 36.02x $65.6B $24.7B
    CRM
    Salesforce
    9.02x 56.52x $9.4B $1.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns MSFT or CRWD?

    CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 37.61% compared to Microsoft's net margin of -1.67%. Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of 4.89%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    69.35% $3.30 $332.8B
    CRWD
    CrowdStrike Holdings
    74.75% -$0.07 $3.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About MSFT or CRWD?

    Microsoft has a consensus price target of $507.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.24%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $375.18 which suggests that it could grow by 3.56%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    37 5 0
    CRWD
    CrowdStrike Holdings
    27 9 2
  • Is MSFT or CRWD More Risky?

    Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.139% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.217%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSFT or CRWD?

    Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MSFT or CRWD?

    Microsoft quarterly revenues are $65.6B, which are larger than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Microsoft's net income of $24.7B is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$16.8M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 710.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 12.83x versus 24.09x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    12.83x 36.02x $65.6B $24.7B
    CRWD
    CrowdStrike Holdings
    24.09x 710.37x $1B -$16.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns MSFT or MSTR?

    MicroStrategy has a net margin of 37.61% compared to Microsoft's net margin of -293.07%. Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68% beat MicroStrategy's return on equity of -16.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    69.35% $3.30 $332.8B
    MSTR
    MicroStrategy
    70.41% -$1.72 $8B
  • What do Analysts Say About MSFT or MSTR?

    Microsoft has a consensus price target of $507.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.24%. On the other hand MicroStrategy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.42%. Given that MicroStrategy has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe MicroStrategy is more attractive than Microsoft.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    37 5 0
    MSTR
    MicroStrategy
    0 0 0
  • Is MSFT or MSTR More Risky?

    Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.139% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MicroStrategy has a beta of 3.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 217.477%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSFT or MSTR?

    Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. MicroStrategy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. MicroStrategy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MSFT or MSTR?

    Microsoft quarterly revenues are $65.6B, which are larger than MicroStrategy quarterly revenues of $116.1M. Microsoft's net income of $24.7B is higher than MicroStrategy's net income of -$340.2M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while MicroStrategy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 12.83x versus 151.04x for MicroStrategy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    12.83x 36.02x $65.6B $24.7B
    MSTR
    MicroStrategy
    151.04x -- $116.1M -$340.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns MSFT or UBER?

    Uber Technologies has a net margin of 37.61% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 23.35%. Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 33.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    69.35% $3.30 $332.8B
    UBER
    Uber Technologies
    39.57% $1.20 $27.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About MSFT or UBER?

    Microsoft has a consensus price target of $507.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.24%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $90.05 which suggests that it could grow by 48.29%. Given that Uber Technologies has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Uber Technologies is more attractive than Microsoft.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    37 5 0
    UBER
    Uber Technologies
    32 8 0
  • Is MSFT or UBER More Risky?

    Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, which suggesting that the stock is 10.139% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.034%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock MSFT or UBER?

    Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios MSFT or UBER?

    Microsoft quarterly revenues are $65.6B, which are larger than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $11.2B. Microsoft's net income of $24.7B is higher than Uber Technologies's net income of $2.6B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.02x while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 30.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 12.83x versus 3.08x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    MSFT
    Microsoft
    12.83x 36.02x $65.6B $24.7B
    UBER
    Uber Technologies
    3.08x 30.21x $11.2B $2.6B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23

Quantum [QMCO] is up 0.73% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23

Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 6.88% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 5.35% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock