MSFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of 34.62% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 17.09%. Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $499.16, signalling upside risk potential of 30.89%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $373.49 which suggests that it could grow by 46.4%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.29399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.885%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $69.6B, which are larger than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Microsoft's net income of $24.1B is higher than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.70x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 40.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 10.88x versus 6.55x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 34.62% compared to Microsoft's net margin of -33.19%. Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -32.41%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $499.16, signalling upside risk potential of 30.89%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $201.86 which suggests that it could grow by 33.55%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.29399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $69.6B, which are larger than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $986.8M. Microsoft's net income of $24.1B is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$327.5M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.70x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 10.88x versus 13.87x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of 34.62% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 57.56%. Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 63.2%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $499.16, signalling upside risk potential of 30.89%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $88.78 which suggests that it could grow by 22.15%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.29399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.765%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $69.6B, which are larger than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $12B. Microsoft's net income of $24.1B is higher than Uber Technologies's net income of $6.9B. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.70x while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 15.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 10.88x versus 3.52x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 34.62% compared to Microsoft's net margin of 4.25%. Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

Microsoft has a consensus price target of $499.16, signalling upside risk potential of 30.89%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $309.98 which suggests that it could grow by 33.95%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Microsoft.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.29399999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.323, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.275%.

Microsoft has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Microsoft pays 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Microsoft quarterly revenues are $69.6B, which are larger than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Microsoft's net income of $24.1B is higher than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, Microsoft's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.70x while Workday's PE ratio is 118.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Microsoft is 10.88x versus 7.38x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.