CRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of 17.09% compared to Salesforce's net margin of 34.62%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $373.49, signalling upside risk potential of 46.47%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $499.16 which suggests that it could grow by 28.5%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Microsoft.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.885% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.29399999999999%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $10B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Salesforce's net income of $1.7B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.09x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.55x versus 11.09x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of 17.09% compared to Salesforce's net margin of 20.78%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45% beat Oracle's return on equity of 104.49%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $373.49, signalling upside risk potential of 46.47%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $184.26 which suggests that it could grow by 39.23%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Oracle.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.885% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.513%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Oracle offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 41.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $10B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $14.1B. Salesforce's net income of $1.7B is lower than Oracle's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.09x while Oracle's PE ratio is 31.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.55x versus 6.78x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of 17.09% compared to Salesforce's net margin of -33.19%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -32.41%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $373.49, signalling upside risk potential of 46.47%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $201.86 which suggests that it could grow by 39.25%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Snowflake.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.885% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $10B, which are larger than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $986.8M. Salesforce's net income of $1.7B is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$327.5M. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.09x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.55x versus 13.30x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 17.09% compared to Salesforce's net margin of 4.25%. Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

Salesforce has a consensus price target of $373.49, signalling upside risk potential of 46.47%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $309.98 which suggests that it could grow by 36.85%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Workday.

Salesforce has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.885% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.323, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.275%.

Salesforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Salesforce pays 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Salesforce quarterly revenues are $10B, which are larger than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Salesforce's net income of $1.7B is higher than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, Salesforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.09x while Workday's PE ratio is 115.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Salesforce is 6.55x versus 7.22x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.