CDNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 19.59% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 17.52%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $323.79, signalling upside risk potential of 5.9%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $327.01 which suggests that it could grow by 9.64%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.027, which suggesting that the stock is 2.746% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.152%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $275M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.13x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 59.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 18.93x versus 10.85x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ansys has a net margin of 19.59% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 21.3%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48% beat Ansys's return on equity of 10.43%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $323.79, signalling upside risk potential of 5.9%. On the other hand Ansys has an analysts' consensus of $348.25 which suggests that it could grow by 4.28%. Given that Cadence Design Systems has higher upside potential than Ansys, analysts believe Cadence Design Systems is more attractive than Ansys.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.027, which suggesting that the stock is 2.746% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ansys has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.468%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ansys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ansys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Ansys quarterly revenues of $601.9M. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M is higher than Ansys's net income of $128.2M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.13x while Ansys's PE ratio is 52.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 18.93x versus 12.03x for Ansys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 19.59% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 37.61%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 35.68%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $323.79, signalling upside risk potential of 5.9%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $507.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.24%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.027, which suggesting that the stock is 2.746% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.139%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $65.6B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.7B. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.13x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 18.93x versus 12.83x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of 19.59% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 68.1%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 30.71%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $323.79, signalling upside risk potential of 5.9%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $637.78 which suggests that it could grow by 29.58%. Given that Synopsys has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Synopsys is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.027, which suggesting that the stock is 2.746% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.289%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M is lower than Synopsys's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 79.13x while Synopsys's PE ratio is 33.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 18.93x versus 12.24x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.