GLRE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of 16.5% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of 4.96%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 7.04% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.56%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $398.04 which suggests that it could grow by 18.49%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Everest Group.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.665, which suggesting that the stock is 33.457% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.791%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $29.6M is lower than Everest Group's net income of $210M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.47x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 17.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.71x versus 0.83x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 16.5% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of -130.67%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 7.04% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -135.59%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.56%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 100%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Greenlight Capital Re, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Greenlight Capital Re.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.665, which suggesting that the stock is 33.457% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.533%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $6.6M. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $29.6M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$8.6M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.47x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.71x versus 1.57x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oxbridge Re Holdings has a net margin of 16.5% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of 15.61%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 7.04% beat Oxbridge Re Holdings's return on equity of -21.13%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.56%. On the other hand Oxbridge Re Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 187.94%. Given that Oxbridge Re Holdings has higher upside potential than Greenlight Capital Re, analysts believe Oxbridge Re Holdings is more attractive than Greenlight Capital Re.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.665, which suggesting that the stock is 33.457% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oxbridge Re Holdings has a beta of 1.537, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.683%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oxbridge Re Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oxbridge Re Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are larger than Oxbridge Re Holdings quarterly revenues of $692K. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $29.6M is higher than Oxbridge Re Holdings's net income of $108K. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.47x while Oxbridge Re Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.71x versus 8.06x for Oxbridge Re Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patria Investments has a net margin of 16.5% compared to Greenlight Capital Re's net margin of 36.11%. Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 7.04% beat Patria Investments's return on equity of 14.81%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.56%. On the other hand Patria Investments has an analysts' consensus of $14.92 which suggests that it could grow by 15.9%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Patria Investments, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Patria Investments.

Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.665, which suggesting that the stock is 33.457% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlight Capital Re has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Patria Investments offers a yield of 5.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Greenlight Capital Re pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Patria Investments pays out 184.19% of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues are $179.6M, which are larger than Patria Investments quarterly revenues of $157.3M. Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $29.6M is lower than Patria Investments's net income of $56.8M. Notably, Greenlight Capital Re's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.47x while Patria Investments's PE ratio is 26.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlight Capital Re is 0.71x versus 5.32x for Patria Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.