ACGL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of 20.73% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of -12.85%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 21.25% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 9.78%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $113.33, signalling upside risk potential of 29.04%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $404.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.02%. Given that Arch Capital Group has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Arch Capital Group is more attractive than Everest Group.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.807%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Arch Capital Group's net income of $935M is higher than Everest Group's net income of -$593M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.84x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 10.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 1.98x versus 0.84x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of 20.73% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of 5.82%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 21.25% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 17.67%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $113.33, signalling upside risk potential of 29.04%. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $23.83 which suggests that it could grow by 23.87%. Given that Arch Capital Group has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Arch Capital Group is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arch Capital Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $583M. Arch Capital Group's net income of $935M is higher than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.84x while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 5.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 1.98x versus 0.88x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of 20.73% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of -570.56%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 21.25% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $113.33, signalling upside risk potential of 29.04%. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 153.04%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Arch Capital Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Arch Capital Group.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.628%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arch Capital Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $27.7M. Arch Capital Group's net income of $935M is higher than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.84x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 1.98x versus 0.90x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RenaissanceRe Holdings has a net margin of 20.73% compared to Arch Capital Group's net margin of -8.32%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 21.25% beat RenaissanceRe Holdings's return on equity of 11.16%.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus price target of $113.33, signalling upside risk potential of 29.04%. On the other hand RenaissanceRe Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $278.36 which suggests that it could grow by 19.64%. Given that Arch Capital Group has higher upside potential than RenaissanceRe Holdings, analysts believe Arch Capital Group is more attractive than RenaissanceRe Holdings.

Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RenaissanceRe Holdings has a beta of 0.286, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.428%.

Arch Capital Group has a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RenaissanceRe Holdings offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Arch Capital Group pays 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. RenaissanceRe Holdings pays out 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than RenaissanceRe Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Arch Capital Group's net income of $935M is higher than RenaissanceRe Holdings's net income of -$189.7M. Notably, Arch Capital Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.84x while RenaissanceRe Holdings's PE ratio is 6.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arch Capital Group is 1.98x versus 1.03x for RenaissanceRe Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.