ALL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mercury General has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Allstate's net margin of 15.09%. Allstate's return on equity of 23.5% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 34.73%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $224.53, signalling upside risk potential of 24.06%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 64.51%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Allstate.

Allstate has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 47.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.654%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Mercury General offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Allstate pays -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 73% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.6B, which are larger than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Allstate's net income of $1.2B is higher than Mercury General's net income of $230.9M. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 4.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.77x versus 0.49x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Allstate's net margin of 11.84%. Allstate's return on equity of 23.5% beat Progressive's return on equity of 36.88%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $224.53, signalling upside risk potential of 24.06%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $277.7647 which suggests that it could grow by 17.89%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Progressive.

Allstate has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 47.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.411, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.864%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. Progressive offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share. Allstate pays -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 7.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.6B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $19.7B. Allstate's net income of $1.2B is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.77x versus 1.92x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Allstate's net margin of 10.59%. Allstate's return on equity of 23.5% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 18.55%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $224.53, signalling upside risk potential of 24.06%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $264.29 which suggests that it could grow by 13.71%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Allstate has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 47.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.297%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Allstate pays -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 30.36% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.6B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Allstate's net income of $1.2B is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 11.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.77x versus 1.19x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Allstate's net margin of 10.83%. Allstate's return on equity of 23.5% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.53%.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $224.53, signalling upside risk potential of 24.06%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $64.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.88%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than WR Berkley.

Allstate has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 47.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.214%.

Allstate has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.03%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Allstate pays -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 36.3% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Allstate quarterly revenues are $16.6B, which are larger than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Allstate's net income of $1.2B is higher than WR Berkley's net income of $365.6M. Notably, Allstate's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 14.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Allstate is 0.77x versus 1.74x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.