MHLD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conduit Holdings has a net margin of -570.56% compared to Maiden Holdings's net margin of --. Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51% beat Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2%.

Maiden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.04%. On the other hand Conduit Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Maiden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Conduit Holdings offers a yield of 5.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Maiden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings pays out 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are larger than Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M is higher than Conduit Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Maiden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Conduit Holdings's PE ratio is 7.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maiden Holdings is 1.47x versus 1.32x for Conduit Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Everest Group has a net margin of -570.56% compared to Maiden Holdings's net margin of 4.96%. Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97%.

Maiden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.04%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $398.27 which suggests that it could grow by 14.66%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Everest Group.

Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.791%.

Maiden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Maiden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M is lower than Everest Group's net income of $210M. Notably, Maiden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Everest Group's PE ratio is 17.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maiden Holdings is 1.47x versus 0.86x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of -570.56% compared to Maiden Holdings's net margin of 32.78%. Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 8.44%.

Maiden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.04%. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -70.03%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Enstar Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Enstar Group.

Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.743%.

Maiden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maiden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 6.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are smaller than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $180M. Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M is lower than Enstar Group's net income of $59M. Notably, Maiden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 10.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maiden Holdings is 1.47x versus 4.42x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of -570.56% compared to Maiden Holdings's net margin of 5.82%. Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 17.67%.

Maiden Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.04%. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $22.83 which suggests that it could grow by 19.8%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.315, which suggesting that the stock is 31.533% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Maiden Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Maiden Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues are $27.7M, which are smaller than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $583M. Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M is lower than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Maiden Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 5.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Maiden Holdings is 1.47x versus 0.87x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.