CNDHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Everest Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 4.96%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $398.04 which suggests that it could grow by 18.36%. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.791%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Everest Group's net income of $210M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 17.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 0.83x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enstar Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 32.78%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 8.44%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -70.11%. Given that Enstar Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Enstar Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.743%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 6.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $180M. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Enstar Group's net income of $59M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 10.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 4.43x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 10.35%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 13.83%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $23.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.75%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $781.7M. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $80.9M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 6.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 0.89x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maiden Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of -130.67%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -135.59%.

Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.31%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.533%.

Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $6.6M. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$8.6M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 1.63x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.