Financhill
Sell
37

CNDHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$6.20
Seasonality move :
0%
Day range:
$6.20 - $6.20
52-week range:
$6.20 - $6.77
Dividend yield:
5.81%
P/E ratio:
7.85x
P/S ratio:
1.32x
P/B ratio:
0.93x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-8.43%
Market cap:
$973.7M
Revenue:
$746.3M
EPS (TTM):
$0.79

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CNDHF
Conduit Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
ACGL
Arch Capital Group
$4.8B $1.31 5.59% -30.75% $112.00
EG
Everest Group
$3.9B $7.74 -1.57% -10.55% $398.27
ESGR
Enstar Group
-- -- -- -- --
HG
Hamilton Insurance Group
$498M -$0.05 -26.59% -75.75% $22.83
MHLD
Maiden Holdings
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CNDHF
Conduit Holdings
$6.20 -- $973.7M 7.85x $0.18 5.81% 1.32x
ACGL
Arch Capital Group
$92.58 $112.00 $34.8B 9.49x $5.00 0% 2.01x
EG
Everest Group
$348.39 $398.27 $14.8B 17.92x $2.00 2.3% 0.86x
ESGR
Enstar Group
$334.36 -- $5B 10.65x $0.00 0% 4.43x
HG
Hamilton Insurance Group
$18.85 $22.83 $1.9B 5.18x $0.00 0% 0.86x
MHLD
Maiden Holdings
$1.33 -- $131.7M -- $0.00 0% 1.52x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CNDHF
Conduit Holdings
-- -0.471 -- 17.23x
ACGL
Arch Capital Group
11.24% 1.107 7.38% 10.30x
EG
Everest Group
20.24% 0.645 23.23% 9.21x
ESGR
Enstar Group
23.89% 0.244 35.6% 144.25x
HG
Hamilton Insurance Group
6.05% 1.296 7.76% 5.50x
MHLD
Maiden Holdings
84.93% -0.144 152.21% --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CNDHF
Conduit Holdings
-- -- 12.2% 12.2% -- --
ACGL
Arch Capital Group
-- -- 15.92% 17.99% 15.52% $1.4B
EG
Everest Group
-- -- 4.8% 5.97% 6.75% $928M
ESGR
Enstar Group
-- -- 6.45% 8.44% 43.33% $143M
HG
Hamilton Insurance Group
-- -- 16.57% 17.67% 14.1% $284.1M
MHLD
Maiden Holdings
-- -- -44.4% -101.51% -547.04% -$48.3M

Conduit Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CNDHF or ACGL?

    Arch Capital Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 12.5%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 17.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    -- -- $1.1B
    ACGL
    Arch Capital Group
    -- $1.48 $24.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About CNDHF or ACGL?

    Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Arch Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of $112.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.98%. Given that Arch Capital Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Arch Capital Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    0 0 0
    ACGL
    Arch Capital Group
    6 4 0
  • Is CNDHF or ACGL More Risky?

    Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.569, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.129%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNDHF or ACGL?

    Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Arch Capital Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Arch Capital Group pays out 44.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNDHF or ACGL?

    Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Arch Capital Group quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Arch Capital Group's net income of $574M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Arch Capital Group's PE ratio is 9.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 2.01x for Arch Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    1.32x 7.85x -- --
    ACGL
    Arch Capital Group
    2.01x 9.49x $4.6B $574M
  • Which has Higher Returns CNDHF or EG?

    Everest Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 4.96%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    -- -- $1.1B
    EG
    Everest Group
    -- $4.90 $17.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About CNDHF or EG?

    Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $398.27 which suggests that it could grow by 14.32%. Given that Everest Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Everest Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    0 0 0
    EG
    Everest Group
    3 6 0
  • Is CNDHF or EG More Risky?

    Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.791%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNDHF or EG?

    Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNDHF or EG?

    Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Everest Group's net income of $210M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 17.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 0.86x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    1.32x 7.85x -- --
    EG
    Everest Group
    0.86x 17.92x $4.2B $210M
  • Which has Higher Returns CNDHF or ESGR?

    Enstar Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 32.78%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Enstar Group's return on equity of 8.44%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    -- -- $1.1B
    ESGR
    Enstar Group
    -- $3.32 $8.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About CNDHF or ESGR?

    Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enstar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -70.09%. Given that Enstar Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Enstar Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    0 0 0
    ESGR
    Enstar Group
    0 0 0
  • Is CNDHF or ESGR More Risky?

    Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enstar Group has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.743%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNDHF or ESGR?

    Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Enstar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Enstar Group pays out 6.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNDHF or ESGR?

    Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Enstar Group quarterly revenues of $180M. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Enstar Group's net income of $59M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Enstar Group's PE ratio is 10.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 4.43x for Enstar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    1.32x 7.85x -- --
    ESGR
    Enstar Group
    4.43x 10.65x $180M $59M
  • Which has Higher Returns CNDHF or HG?

    Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of 5.82%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 17.67%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    -- -- $1.1B
    HG
    Hamilton Insurance Group
    -- $0.32 $2.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About CNDHF or HG?

    Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $22.83 which suggests that it could grow by 21.13%. Given that Hamilton Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Hamilton Insurance Group is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    0 0 0
    HG
    Hamilton Insurance Group
    1 1 0
  • Is CNDHF or HG More Risky?

    Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNDHF or HG?

    Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNDHF or HG?

    Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $583M. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 5.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 0.86x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    1.32x 7.85x -- --
    HG
    Hamilton Insurance Group
    0.86x 5.18x $583M $33.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns CNDHF or MHLD?

    Maiden Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Conduit Holdings's net margin of -570.56%. Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2% beat Maiden Holdings's return on equity of -101.51%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    -- -- $1.1B
    MHLD
    Maiden Holdings
    -- -$1.59 $300M
  • What do Analysts Say About CNDHF or MHLD?

    Conduit Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Maiden Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 50.38%. Given that Maiden Holdings has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Maiden Holdings is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    0 0 0
    MHLD
    Maiden Holdings
    0 0 0
  • Is CNDHF or MHLD More Risky?

    Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maiden Holdings has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.533%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNDHF or MHLD?

    Conduit Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.81%. Maiden Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Conduit Holdings pays 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Maiden Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CNDHF or MHLD?

    Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Maiden Holdings quarterly revenues of $27.7M. Conduit Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Maiden Holdings's net income of -$158M. Notably, Conduit Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.85x while Maiden Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Conduit Holdings is 1.32x versus 1.52x for Maiden Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CNDHF
    Conduit Holdings
    1.32x 7.85x -- --
    MHLD
    Maiden Holdings
    1.52x -- $27.7M -$158M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Shopify Stock Still a Buy in 2025 or Has Growth Peaked?
Is Shopify Stock Still a Buy in 2025 or Has Growth Peaked?

The big picture trends in e‑commerce sales are clearly in…

Is RTX The Best Growth Stock?
Is RTX The Best Growth Stock?

Among the worldwide aerospace and defense markets, the US controls…

Is VFS Stock Cheap to Buy Now?
Is VFS Stock Cheap to Buy Now?

VinFast Auto (NASDAQ:VFS) is a leading EV manufacturer in Vietnam.…

Stock Ideas

Buy
71
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
63
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Sell
4
CABO alert for May 6

Cable One [CABO] is up 15.11% over the past day.

Buy
55
PDEX alert for May 5

Pro-Dex [PDEX] is down 3.12% over the past day.

Buy
91
TRUP alert for May 5

Trupanion [TRUP] is down 0.38% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock