PAX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Carlyle Group has a net margin of 36.11% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 19.51%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 14.81% beat The Carlyle Group's return on equity of 17.76%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 15.9%. On the other hand The Carlyle Group has an analysts' consensus of $49.11 which suggests that it could grow by 10.93%. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than The Carlyle Group, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than The Carlyle Group.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Carlyle Group has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.409%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.83%. The Carlyle Group offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Patria Investments pays 184.19% of its earnings as a dividend. The Carlyle Group pays out 49.29% of its earnings as a dividend. The Carlyle Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Patria Investments's is not.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are smaller than The Carlyle Group quarterly revenues of $666.5M. Patria Investments's net income of $56.8M is lower than The Carlyle Group's net income of $130M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.87x while The Carlyle Group's PE ratio is 15.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.32x versus 4.68x for The Carlyle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 36.11% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 24.7%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 14.81% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 24.93%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 15.9%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 0.752, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.85%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.83%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 4.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Patria Investments pays 184.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Patria Investments's is not.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $42M. Patria Investments's net income of $56.8M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $10.4M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.87x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 9.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.32x versus 2.47x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenlight Capital Re has a net margin of 36.11% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 16.5%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 14.81% beat Greenlight Capital Re's return on equity of 7.04%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 15.9%. On the other hand Greenlight Capital Re has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 55.56%. Given that Greenlight Capital Re has higher upside potential than Patria Investments, analysts believe Greenlight Capital Re is more attractive than Patria Investments.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenlight Capital Re has a beta of 0.665, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.457%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.83%. Greenlight Capital Re offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Patria Investments pays 184.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenlight Capital Re pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are smaller than Greenlight Capital Re quarterly revenues of $179.6M. Patria Investments's net income of $56.8M is higher than Greenlight Capital Re's net income of $29.6M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.87x while Greenlight Capital Re's PE ratio is 10.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.32x versus 0.71x for Greenlight Capital Re. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 36.11% compared to Patria Investments's net margin of 90.2%. Patria Investments's return on equity of 14.81% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

Patria Investments has a consensus price target of $14.92, signalling upside risk potential of 15.9%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could fall by -0.12%. Given that Patria Investments has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Patria Investments is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.64%.

Patria Investments has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.83%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 15.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Patria Investments pays 184.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patria Investments quarterly revenues are $157.3M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. Patria Investments's net income of $56.8M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, Patria Investments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.87x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 108.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patria Investments is 5.32x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.