AVAV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 4% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 7.97%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.88% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.35%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $321.05 which suggests that it could grow by 20.63%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than General Dynamics.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.446, which suggesting that the stock is 55.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.532%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $188.5M, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $11.7B. AeroVironment's net income of $7.5M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $930M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.61x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 5.83x versus 1.59x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 4% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 7.33%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.88% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.41%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.35%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $135.51 which suggests that it could grow by 16.1%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than RTX.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.446, which suggesting that the stock is 55.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.125%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $188.5M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.1B. AeroVironment's net income of $7.5M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.61x while RTX's PE ratio is 33.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 5.83x versus 1.98x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe Pro Group has a net margin of 4% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of -371.8%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.88% beat Safe Pro Group's return on equity of --.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.35%. On the other hand Safe Pro Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Safe Pro Group, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Safe Pro Group.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.446, which suggesting that the stock is 55.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe Pro Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe Pro Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe Pro Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $188.5M, which are larger than Safe Pro Group quarterly revenues of $307.7K. AeroVironment's net income of $7.5M is higher than Safe Pro Group's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.61x while Safe Pro Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 5.83x versus -- for Safe Pro Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Textron has a net margin of 4% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 6.51%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 5.88% beat Textron's return on equity of 12.66%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 46.35%. On the other hand Textron has an analysts' consensus of $97.60 which suggests that it could grow by 25.84%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Textron, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Textron.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.446, which suggesting that the stock is 55.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Textron has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.536%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Textron offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Textron pays out 1.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $188.5M, which are smaller than Textron quarterly revenues of $3.4B. AeroVironment's net income of $7.5M is lower than Textron's net income of $223M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.61x while Textron's PE ratio is 16.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 5.83x versus 1.07x for Textron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.