XEL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evergy has a net margin of 14.87% compared to Xcel Energy's net margin of 6.22%. Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.49% beat Evergy's return on equity of 8.89%.

Xcel Energy has a consensus price target of $73.82, signalling upside risk potential of 6.94%. On the other hand Evergy has an analysts' consensus of $71.43 which suggests that it could grow by 6.69%. Given that Xcel Energy has higher upside potential than Evergy, analysts believe Xcel Energy is more attractive than Evergy.

Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evergy has a beta of 0.524, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.554%.

Xcel Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Evergy offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Xcel Energy pays 60.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Evergy pays out 68.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xcel Energy quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Evergy quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Xcel Energy's net income of $464M is higher than Evergy's net income of $78.2M. Notably, Xcel Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.05x while Evergy's PE ratio is 17.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xcel Energy is 2.89x versus 2.64x for Evergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Alliant Energy has a net margin of 14.87% compared to Xcel Energy's net margin of 15.37%. Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.49% beat Alliant Energy's return on equity of 10.04%.

Xcel Energy has a consensus price target of $73.82, signalling upside risk potential of 6.94%. On the other hand Alliant Energy has an analysts' consensus of $64.88 which suggests that it could grow by 9.43%. Given that Alliant Energy has higher upside potential than Xcel Energy, analysts believe Alliant Energy is more attractive than Xcel Energy.

Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.521, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.855%.

Xcel Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. Alliant Energy offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Xcel Energy pays 60.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Alliant Energy pays out 71.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xcel Energy quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Alliant Energy quarterly revenues of $976M. Xcel Energy's net income of $464M is higher than Alliant Energy's net income of $150M. Notably, Xcel Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.05x while Alliant Energy's PE ratio is 22.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xcel Energy is 2.89x versus 3.82x for Alliant Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSource has a net margin of 14.87% compared to Xcel Energy's net margin of 14.1%. Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.49% beat NiSource's return on equity of 7.49%.

Xcel Energy has a consensus price target of $73.82, signalling upside risk potential of 6.94%. On the other hand NiSource has an analysts' consensus of $41.77 which suggests that it could grow by 9.59%. Given that NiSource has higher upside potential than Xcel Energy, analysts believe NiSource is more attractive than Xcel Energy.

Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSource has a beta of 0.483, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.669%.

Xcel Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. NiSource offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Xcel Energy pays 60.69% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSource pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xcel Energy quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than NiSource quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Xcel Energy's net income of $464M is higher than NiSource's net income of $223.9M. Notably, Xcel Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.05x while NiSource's PE ratio is 23.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xcel Energy is 2.89x versus 3.19x for NiSource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PPL has a net margin of 14.87% compared to Xcel Energy's net margin of 8.01%. Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.49% beat PPL's return on equity of 6.32%.

Xcel Energy has a consensus price target of $73.82, signalling upside risk potential of 6.94%. On the other hand PPL has an analysts' consensus of $36.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.92%. Given that Xcel Energy has higher upside potential than PPL, analysts believe Xcel Energy is more attractive than PPL.

Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.101% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PPL has a beta of 0.654, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.633%.

Xcel Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.21%. PPL offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Xcel Energy pays 60.69% of its earnings as a dividend. PPL pays out 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xcel Energy quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than PPL quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Xcel Energy's net income of $464M is higher than PPL's net income of $177M. Notably, Xcel Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.05x while PPL's PE ratio is 29.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xcel Energy is 2.89x versus 3.09x for PPL. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.