PPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duke Energy has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 16.37%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 8.94%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.51, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $124.21 which suggests that it could grow by 2.37%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than Duke Energy, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than Duke Energy.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.548%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 71.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $7.4B. PPL's net income of $414M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.2B. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.73x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 21.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 3.08x versus 3.09x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Alliant Energy has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 15.37%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat Alliant Energy's return on equity of 10.04%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.51, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand Alliant Energy has an analysts' consensus of $65.09 which suggests that it could grow by 7.49%. Given that Alliant Energy has higher upside potential than PPL, analysts believe Alliant Energy is more attractive than PPL.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.577, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.296%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Alliant Energy offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Alliant Energy pays out 71.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Alliant Energy quarterly revenues of $976M. PPL's net income of $414M is higher than Alliant Energy's net income of $150M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.73x while Alliant Energy's PE ratio is 22.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 3.08x versus 3.90x for Alliant Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PG&E has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 10.6%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat PG&E's return on equity of 8.56%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.51, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand PG&E has an analysts' consensus of $20.83 which suggests that it could grow by 24.95%. Given that PG&E has higher upside potential than PPL, analysts believe PG&E is more attractive than PPL.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PG&E has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.288%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. PG&E offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. PG&E pays out 3.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than PG&E quarterly revenues of $6B. PPL's net income of $414M is lower than PG&E's net income of $634M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.73x while PG&E's PE ratio is 15.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 3.08x versus 1.47x for PG&E. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 12.37%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.22%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.51, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand Xcel Energy has an analysts' consensus of $74.94 which suggests that it could grow by 6%. Given that Xcel Energy has higher upside potential than PPL, analysts believe Xcel Energy is more attractive than PPL.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.386, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.418%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Xcel Energy offers a yield of 3.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy pays out 60.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Xcel Energy quarterly revenues of $3.9B. PPL's net income of $414M is lower than Xcel Energy's net income of $483M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.73x while Xcel Energy's PE ratio is 20.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 3.08x versus 2.93x for Xcel Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.