PPL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duke Energy has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 16.72%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 9.35%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.63, signalling upside risk potential of 7.95%. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $127.58 which suggests that it could grow by 9.79%. Given that Duke Energy has higher upside potential than PPL, analysts believe Duke Energy is more attractive than PPL.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.548%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 71.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $8.2B. PPL's net income of $414M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.82x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 19.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.98x versus 2.91x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Idacorp has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 13.79%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat Idacorp's return on equity of 9.34%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.63, signalling upside risk potential of 7.95%. On the other hand Idacorp has an analysts' consensus of $126.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.62%. Given that Idacorp has higher upside potential than PPL, analysts believe Idacorp is more attractive than PPL.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Idacorp has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.443%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Idacorp offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Idacorp pays out 61.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Idacorp quarterly revenues of $432.5M. PPL's net income of $414M is higher than Idacorp's net income of $59.6M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.82x while Idacorp's PE ratio is 20.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.98x versus 3.41x for Idacorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Alliant Energy has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 18.88%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat Alliant Energy's return on equity of 10.74%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.63, signalling upside risk potential of 7.95%. On the other hand Alliant Energy has an analysts' consensus of $65.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.17%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than Alliant Energy, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than Alliant Energy.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.577, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.296%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Alliant Energy offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Alliant Energy pays out 71.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Alliant Energy quarterly revenues of $1.1B. PPL's net income of $414M is higher than Alliant Energy's net income of $213M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.82x while Alliant Energy's PE ratio is 21.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.98x versus 3.94x for Alliant Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of 16.53% compared to PPL's net margin of 12.37%. PPL's return on equity of 7.05% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.22%.

PPL has a consensus price target of $37.63, signalling upside risk potential of 7.95%. On the other hand Xcel Energy has an analysts' consensus of $75.19 which suggests that it could grow by 4.31%. Given that PPL has higher upside potential than Xcel Energy, analysts believe PPL is more attractive than Xcel Energy.

PPL has a beta of 0.701, which suggesting that the stock is 29.886% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.386, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.418%.

PPL has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3%. Xcel Energy offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. PPL pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy pays out 60.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PPL quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Xcel Energy quarterly revenues of $3.9B. PPL's net income of $414M is lower than Xcel Energy's net income of $483M. Notably, PPL's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.82x while Xcel Energy's PE ratio is 21.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PPL is 2.98x versus 3.00x for Xcel Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.