NI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CMS Energy has a net margin of 21.75% compared to NiSource's net margin of 12.42%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.44% beat CMS Energy's return on equity of 11.76%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of $42.63, signalling upside risk potential of 9.09%. On the other hand CMS Energy has an analysts' consensus of $75.08 which suggests that it could grow by 5.13%. Given that NiSource has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe NiSource is more attractive than CMS Energy.

NiSource has a beta of 0.534, which suggesting that the stock is 46.601% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CMS Energy has a beta of 0.421, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.871%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. CMS Energy offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. NiSource pays 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. CMS Energy pays out 62.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than CMS Energy quarterly revenues of $2.4B. NiSource's net income of $474.8M is higher than CMS Energy's net income of $304M. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.01x while CMS Energy's PE ratio is 21.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.04x versus 2.74x for CMS Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CenterPoint Energy has a net margin of 21.75% compared to NiSource's net margin of 10.17%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.44% beat CenterPoint Energy's return on equity of 9.2%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of $42.63, signalling upside risk potential of 9.09%. On the other hand CenterPoint Energy has an analysts' consensus of $38.44 which suggests that it could grow by 2.29%. Given that NiSource has higher upside potential than CenterPoint Energy, analysts believe NiSource is more attractive than CenterPoint Energy.

NiSource has a beta of 0.534, which suggesting that the stock is 46.601% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CenterPoint Energy has a beta of 0.626, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.368%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. CenterPoint Energy offers a yield of 2.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. NiSource pays 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. CenterPoint Energy pays out 51.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than CenterPoint Energy quarterly revenues of $2.9B. NiSource's net income of $474.8M is higher than CenterPoint Energy's net income of $297M. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.01x while CenterPoint Energy's PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.04x versus 2.72x for CenterPoint Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Entergy has a net margin of 21.75% compared to NiSource's net margin of 12.73%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.44% beat Entergy's return on equity of 9%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of $42.63, signalling upside risk potential of 9.09%. On the other hand Entergy has an analysts' consensus of $89.36 which suggests that it could grow by 7.48%. Given that NiSource has higher upside potential than Entergy, analysts believe NiSource is more attractive than Entergy.

NiSource has a beta of 0.534, which suggesting that the stock is 46.601% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entergy has a beta of 0.621, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.924%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Entergy offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. NiSource pays 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Entergy pays out 94.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Entergy quarterly revenues of $2.8B. NiSource's net income of $474.8M is higher than Entergy's net income of $362.4M. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.01x while Entergy's PE ratio is 26.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.04x versus 3.03x for Entergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exelon has a net margin of 21.75% compared to NiSource's net margin of 13.52%. NiSource's return on equity of 8.44% beat Exelon's return on equity of 10.16%.

NiSource has a consensus price target of $42.63, signalling upside risk potential of 9.09%. On the other hand Exelon has an analysts' consensus of $46.97 which suggests that it could grow by 6.67%. Given that NiSource has higher upside potential than Exelon, analysts believe NiSource is more attractive than Exelon.

NiSource has a beta of 0.534, which suggesting that the stock is 46.601% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exelon has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.261%.

NiSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Exelon offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. NiSource pays 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Exelon pays out 61.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NiSource quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Exelon quarterly revenues of $6.7B. NiSource's net income of $474.8M is lower than Exelon's net income of $908M. Notably, NiSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.01x while Exelon's PE ratio is 16.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NiSource is 3.04x versus 1.87x for Exelon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.