VFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 3.78%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 13.45%.

VF has a consensus price target of $23.02, signalling upside risk potential of 107.18%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.23 which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Ford Motor.

VF has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.125% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.414, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.387%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 8.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $48.2B. VF's net income of $167.8M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $1.8B. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 6.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.42x versus 0.20x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hanesbrands has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of -1.62%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Hanesbrands's return on equity of -159.37%.

VF has a consensus price target of $23.02, signalling upside risk potential of 107.18%. On the other hand Hanesbrands has an analysts' consensus of $6.90 which suggests that it could grow by 56.82%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

VF has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.125% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.549, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.884%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Hanesbrands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Hanesbrands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Hanesbrands quarterly revenues of $796.7M. VF's net income of $167.8M is higher than Hanesbrands's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hanesbrands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.42x versus 0.40x for Hanesbrands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 13.88%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

VF has a consensus price target of $23.02, signalling upside risk potential of 107.18%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $281.25 which suggests that it could grow by 42.1%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

VF has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.125% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.826%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. VF's net income of $167.8M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 18.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.42x versus 1.83x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 0.09%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29%.

VF has a consensus price target of $23.02, signalling upside risk potential of 107.18%. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $8.90 which suggests that it could grow by 71.39%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Under Armour.

VF has a beta of 1.571, which suggesting that the stock is 57.125% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.386%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.24%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.4B. VF's net income of $167.8M is higher than Under Armour's net income of $1.2M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.42x versus 0.43x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.