Financhill
Sell
36

UAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$8.45
Seasonality move :
0.76%
Day range:
$8.27 - $8.45
52-week range:
$6.17 - $11.89
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
12.70x
P/S ratio:
0.69x
P/B ratio:
1.83x
Volume:
2.3M
Avg. volume:
9.8M
1-year change:
-6.13%
Market cap:
$3.6B
Revenue:
$5.7B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.03

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
UAA
Under Armour
$1.4B $0.19 -9.75% -86.8% $9.58
HBI
Hanesbrands
$935.7M $0.12 -67.34% -34.77% --
LCID
Lucid Group
$198.1M -$0.31 26.34% -17.24% $3.27
MODG
Topgolf Callaway Brands
$981.8M -$0.16 -1.3% -1.57% --
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
$1B -$0.90 3.47% -59.07% $15.03
TSLA
Tesla
$25.4B $0.60 8.83% -66.33% $283.88
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
UAA
Under Armour
$8.42 $9.58 $3.6B 12.70x $0.00 0% 0.69x
HBI
Hanesbrands
$8.35 -- $2.9B -- $0.00 0% 0.50x
LCID
Lucid Group
$3.20 $3.27 $9.6B -- $0.00 0% 10.11x
MODG
Topgolf Callaway Brands
$7.80 -- $1.4B 116.70x $0.00 0% 0.36x
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
$14.06 $15.03 $14.4B -- $0.00 0% 3.05x
TSLA
Tesla
$462.28 $283.88 $1.5T 126.65x $0.00 0% 16.61x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
UAA
Under Armour
23.05% 2.013 15.44% 1.06x
HBI
Hanesbrands
95.63% 3.891 126.48% 0.52x
LCID
Lucid Group
43.28% 1.905 24.81% 3.12x
MODG
Topgolf Callaway Brands
27.83% 0.634 75.21% 0.99x
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
48.1% 3.637 47.37% 3.60x
TSLA
Tesla
9.56% 1.482 0.88% 1.21x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
UAA
Under Armour
$696.1M $176.3M -0.79% -1.04% 12.6% -$367.2M
HBI
Hanesbrands
$390.4M $103M -6.4% -92.19% 9.98% $88.1M
LCID
Lucid Group
-$212.5M -$770.5M -47.92% -71.79% -491.66% -$622.5M
MODG
Topgolf Callaway Brands
$635.8M $37.6M -0.21% -0.31% 3.43% $107.7M
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
-$392M -$1.2B -43.8% -68.23% -115.9% -$1.2B
TSLA
Tesla
$5B $2.8B 18.19% 19.77% 11.42% $2.7B

Under Armour vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns UAA or HBI?

    Hanesbrands has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 3.2%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Hanesbrands's return on equity of -92.19%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UAA
    Under Armour
    49.76% $0.39 $2.6B
    HBI
    Hanesbrands
    41.67% $0.08 $3.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About UAA or HBI?

    Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand Hanesbrands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -1.97%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UAA
    Under Armour
    7 15 2
    HBI
    Hanesbrands
    1 3 1
  • Is UAA or HBI More Risky?

    Under Armour has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.037% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.637, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.696%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UAA or HBI?

    Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hanesbrands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hanesbrands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UAA or HBI?

    Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Hanesbrands quarterly revenues of $937.1M. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is higher than Hanesbrands's net income of $30M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Hanesbrands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.69x versus 0.50x for Hanesbrands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UAA
    Under Armour
    0.69x 12.70x $1.4B $170.4M
    HBI
    Hanesbrands
    0.50x -- $937.1M $30M
  • Which has Higher Returns UAA or LCID?

    Lucid Group has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -496.14%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UAA
    Under Armour
    49.76% $0.39 $2.6B
    LCID
    Lucid Group
    -106.23% -$0.41 $4.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About UAA or LCID?

    Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $3.27 which suggests that it could fall by -11.78%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Lucid Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UAA
    Under Armour
    7 15 2
    LCID
    Lucid Group
    1 11 2
  • Is UAA or LCID More Risky?

    Under Armour has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.037% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UAA or LCID?

    Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UAA or LCID?

    Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $200M. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.69x versus 10.11x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UAA
    Under Armour
    0.69x 12.70x $1.4B $170.4M
    LCID
    Lucid Group
    10.11x -- $200M -$992.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns UAA or MODG?

    Topgolf Callaway Brands has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -0.36%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Topgolf Callaway Brands's return on equity of -0.31%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UAA
    Under Armour
    49.76% $0.39 $2.6B
    MODG
    Topgolf Callaway Brands
    62.77% -$0.02 $5.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About UAA or MODG?

    Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand Topgolf Callaway Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 52.82%. Given that Topgolf Callaway Brands has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe Topgolf Callaway Brands is more attractive than Under Armour.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UAA
    Under Armour
    7 15 2
    MODG
    Topgolf Callaway Brands
    0 0 0
  • Is UAA or MODG More Risky?

    Under Armour has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.037% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Topgolf Callaway Brands has a beta of 1.698, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.792%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UAA or MODG?

    Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Topgolf Callaway Brands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Topgolf Callaway Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UAA or MODG?

    Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Topgolf Callaway Brands quarterly revenues of $1B. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is higher than Topgolf Callaway Brands's net income of -$3.6M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Topgolf Callaway Brands's PE ratio is 116.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.69x versus 0.36x for Topgolf Callaway Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UAA
    Under Armour
    0.69x 12.70x $1.4B $170.4M
    MODG
    Topgolf Callaway Brands
    0.36x 116.70x $1B -$3.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns UAA or RIVN?

    Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -125.86%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UAA
    Under Armour
    49.76% $0.39 $2.6B
    RIVN
    Rivian Automotive
    -44.85% -$1.08 $11.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About UAA or RIVN?

    Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $15.03 which suggests that it could grow by 6.92%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UAA
    Under Armour
    7 15 2
    RIVN
    Rivian Automotive
    9 14 0
  • Is UAA or RIVN More Risky?

    Under Armour has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.037% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UAA or RIVN?

    Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UAA or RIVN?

    Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.69x versus 3.05x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UAA
    Under Armour
    0.69x 12.70x $1.4B $170.4M
    RIVN
    Rivian Automotive
    3.05x -- $874M -$1.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns UAA or TSLA?

    Tesla has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 8.61%. Under Armour's return on equity of -1.04% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    UAA
    Under Armour
    49.76% $0.39 $2.6B
    TSLA
    Tesla
    19.84% $0.62 $78.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About UAA or TSLA?

    Under Armour has a consensus price target of $9.58, signalling upside risk potential of 28.89%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -38.59%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Tesla.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    UAA
    Under Armour
    7 15 2
    TSLA
    Tesla
    13 15 8
  • Is UAA or TSLA More Risky?

    Under Armour has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.037% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock UAA or TSLA?

    Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios UAA or TSLA?

    Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Under Armour's net income of $170.4M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Tesla's PE ratio is 126.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.69x versus 16.61x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    UAA
    Under Armour
    0.69x 12.70x $1.4B $170.4M
    TSLA
    Tesla
    16.61x 126.65x $25.2B $2.2B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?

Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…

Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?

Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…

Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?

Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…

Stock Ideas

Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x

Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
60
QMCO alert for Dec 26

Quantum [QMCO] is up 49.62% over the past day.

Buy
53
ARQQ alert for Dec 26

Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 49.85% over the past day.

Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 26

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 3.73% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock