UAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Movado Group has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 3.84%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat Movado Group's return on equity of 3.66%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $8.45, signalling upside risk potential of 44.11%. On the other hand Movado Group has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 127.6%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than Under Armour.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Movado Group has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.359%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Movado Group offers a yield of 10.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Movado Group pays out 169.18% of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Movado Group quarterly revenues of $174.7M. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is lower than Movado Group's net income of $6.7M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Movado Group's PE ratio is 15.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.48x versus 0.48x for Movado Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 7.05%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat Nike's return on equity of 31.91%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $8.45, signalling upside risk potential of 44.11%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $75.61 which suggests that it could grow by 32.51%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Nike.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.681%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.3B. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is lower than Nike's net income of $794M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Nike's PE ratio is 18.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.48x versus 1.79x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 13.88%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $8.45, signalling upside risk potential of 44.11%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $275.13 which suggests that it could grow by 31.27%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.826%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 19.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.48x versus 1.94x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VF has a net margin of 0.09% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 5.92%. Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29% beat VF's return on equity of -27.74%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $8.45, signalling upside risk potential of 44.11%. On the other hand VF has an analysts' consensus of $21.42 which suggests that it could grow by 96.32%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Under Armour.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.386% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VF has a beta of 1.571, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.125%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VF offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VF pays out -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than VF quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Under Armour's net income of $1.2M is lower than VF's net income of $167.8M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while VF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.48x versus 0.41x for VF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.