NKE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deckers Outdoor has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 25%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Deckers Outdoor's return on equity of 42.29%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $80.53, signalling upside risk potential of 40.67%. On the other hand Deckers Outdoor has an analysts' consensus of $210.75 which suggests that it could grow by 98.79%. Given that Deckers Outdoor has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Deckers Outdoor is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deckers Outdoor has a beta of 1.068, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.83%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Deckers Outdoor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Deckers Outdoor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Deckers Outdoor quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Nike's net income of $794M is higher than Deckers Outdoor's net income of $456.7M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.02x while Deckers Outdoor's PE ratio is 17.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 1.79x versus 3.30x for Deckers Outdoor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steven Madden has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 5.98%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Steven Madden's return on equity of 19.88%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $80.53, signalling upside risk potential of 40.67%. On the other hand Steven Madden has an analysts' consensus of $37.44 which suggests that it could grow by 55.37%. Given that Steven Madden has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Steven Madden is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steven Madden has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.131%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Steven Madden offers a yield of 3.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden pays out 36.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Steven Madden quarterly revenues of $582.3M. Nike's net income of $794M is higher than Steven Madden's net income of $34.8M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.02x while Steven Madden's PE ratio is 10.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 1.79x versus 0.76x for Steven Madden. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skechers USA has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 4.49%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Skechers USA's return on equity of 13.73%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $80.53, signalling upside risk potential of 40.67%. On the other hand Skechers USA has an analysts' consensus of $79.85 which suggests that it could grow by 59.06%. Given that Skechers USA has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Skechers USA is more attractive than Nike.

Nike has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skechers USA has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.179%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Skechers USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Skechers USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are larger than Skechers USA quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Nike's net income of $794M is higher than Skechers USA's net income of $99.3M. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.02x while Skechers USA's PE ratio is 12.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 1.79x versus 0.86x for Skechers USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 7.05% compared to Nike's net margin of 9.17%. Nike's return on equity of 31.91% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Nike has a consensus price target of $80.53, signalling upside risk potential of 40.67%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $323.87 which suggests that it could grow by 35.27%. Given that Nike has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Nike is more attractive than Tesla.

Nike has a beta of 1.147, which suggesting that the stock is 14.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

Nike has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nike pays 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nike quarterly revenues are $11.3B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Nike's net income of $794M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Nike's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.02x while Tesla's PE ratio is 117.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nike is 1.79x versus 8.57x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.