CROX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mattel has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Crocs's net margin of 20.2%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.71% beat Mattel's return on equity of 26.12%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.7%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.22 which suggests that it could grow by 33.58%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Crocs, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Crocs.

Crocs has a beta of 1.985, which suggesting that the stock is 98.521% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.393%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Crocs's net income of $199.8M is lower than Mattel's net income of $372.4M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.67x versus 1.16x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Crocs's net margin of 9.41%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.71% beat Nike's return on equity of 34.51%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.7%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $86.48 which suggests that it could grow by 12.62%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Nike.

Crocs has a beta of 1.985, which suggesting that the stock is 98.521% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.318%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out 38.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $12.4B. Crocs's net income of $199.8M is lower than Nike's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while Nike's PE ratio is 23.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.67x versus 2.37x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skechers USA has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Crocs's net margin of 8.23%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.71% beat Skechers USA's return on equity of 13.77%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.7%. On the other hand Skechers USA has an analysts' consensus of $69.92 which suggests that it could grow by 20.94%. Given that Skechers USA has higher upside potential than Crocs, analysts believe Skechers USA is more attractive than Crocs.

Crocs has a beta of 1.985, which suggesting that the stock is 98.521% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skechers USA has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.819%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skechers USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skechers USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Skechers USA quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Crocs's net income of $199.8M is higher than Skechers USA's net income of $193.2M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while Skechers USA's PE ratio is 16.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.67x versus 1.20x for Skechers USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of 18.81% compared to Crocs's net margin of 5.36%. Crocs's return on equity of 54.71% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of -22.79%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 20.7%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.98%. Given that Crocs has higher upside potential than Wolverine World Wide, analysts believe Crocs is more attractive than Wolverine World Wide.

Crocs has a beta of 1.985, which suggesting that the stock is 98.521% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.888, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.844%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out -82.32% of its earnings as a dividend.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $440.2M. Crocs's net income of $199.8M is higher than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $23.6M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.67x versus 1.02x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.