BWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Holley has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of -26.98%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat Holley's return on equity of -5.21%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.42, signalling upside risk potential of 39.15%. On the other hand Holley has an analysts' consensus of $4.57 which suggests that it could grow by 89.69%. Given that Holley has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Holley is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holley has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Holley offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Holley pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Holley quarterly revenues of $140.1M. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than Holley's net income of -$37.8M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.83x while Holley's PE ratio is 22.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.43x versus 0.48x for Holley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of --. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.42, signalling upside risk potential of 39.15%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 52.67%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.518, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.799%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.83x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.43x versus 118.41x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lear has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 1.54%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat Lear's return on equity of 10.36%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.42, signalling upside risk potential of 39.15%. On the other hand Lear has an analysts' consensus of $119.68 which suggests that it could grow by 44.41%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lear has a beta of 1.344, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.377%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Lear offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear pays out 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Lear quarterly revenues of $5.7B. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than Lear's net income of $88.1M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.83x while Lear's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.43x versus 0.20x for Lear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Modine Manufacturing has a net margin of -11.78% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 6.65%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 5.55% beat Modine Manufacturing's return on equity of 19.94%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.42, signalling upside risk potential of 39.15%. On the other hand Modine Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of $144.85 which suggests that it could grow by 101.69%. Given that Modine Manufacturing has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Modine Manufacturing is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Modine Manufacturing has a beta of 2.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.879%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Modine Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Modine Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Modine Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $616.8M. BorgWarner's net income of -$405M is lower than Modine Manufacturing's net income of $41M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.83x while Modine Manufacturing's PE ratio is 24.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.43x versus 1.52x for Modine Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.