LEA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dana has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Lear's net margin of -3.43%. Lear's return on equity of 10.36% beat Dana's return on equity of -3.27%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $109.46, signalling upside risk potential of 39.34%. On the other hand Dana has an analysts' consensus of $17.57 which suggests that it could grow by 55.64%. Given that Dana has higher upside potential than Lear, analysts believe Dana is more attractive than Lear.

Lear has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dana has a beta of 2.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.786%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Dana offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Dana pays out -101.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Dana quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Lear's net income of $88.1M is higher than Dana's net income of -$80M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.79x while Dana's PE ratio is 147.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.19x versus 0.16x for Dana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Lear's net margin of -6.21%. Lear's return on equity of 10.36% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $109.46, signalling upside risk potential of 39.34%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $56.40 which suggests that it could grow by 27.06%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than General Motors.

Lear has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.509%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. General Motors offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Lear's net income of $88.1M is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.79x while General Motors's PE ratio is 6.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.19x versus 0.27x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Lear's net margin of 1.02%. Lear's return on equity of 10.36% beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 7.22%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $109.46, signalling upside risk potential of 39.34%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.7%. Given that Strattec Security has higher upside potential than Lear, analysts believe Strattec Security is more attractive than Lear.

Lear has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.215%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $129.9M. Lear's net income of $88.1M is higher than Strattec Security's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.79x while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 8.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.19x versus 0.24x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Lear's net margin of 12.99%. Lear's return on equity of 10.36% beat Visteon's return on equity of 22.69%.

Lear has a consensus price target of $109.46, signalling upside risk potential of 39.34%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $97.38 which suggests that it could grow by 35.88%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Visteon.

Lear has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.364%.

Lear has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.92%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lear pays 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lear's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lear quarterly revenues are $5.7B, which are larger than Visteon quarterly revenues of $939M. Lear's net income of $88.1M is lower than Visteon's net income of $122M. Notably, Lear's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.79x while Visteon's PE ratio is 7.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lear is 0.19x versus 0.52x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.